[NCUC-EC] reminder: CROP proposals in evaluation

Mon Feb 26 21:33:40 CET 2018

Hi all

I ll review CROPS shortly and come back to you shortly.

@Michael, can you please confirm if you received/or not the NCSG Travel
slot to attend the INTA meeting in Seattle? (dating back to Feb 10th)
https://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/2018-February/000293.html

Thanks

2018-02-26 16:51 GMT+01:00 Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:

> Thanks for the update, Michael! Yep, I guess its both fortunate and
> unfortunate the merger, but I am sure good things can come out of this !
>
> 2018-02-26 11:35 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>
>> Great. By the way, Bruna, your comment on NCUC participation is well
>> taken, but I've also just today heard back from RightsCon saying they
>> want to merge this session in together with one that's been proposed
>> by Xianhong Hu from UNESCO.
>>
>> On the one hand, this may provide a good boost to attendance, and
>> allow an interesting collaboration opportunity. On the other hand, it
>> obviously reduces our "control" over the session and its participants.
>> Still, I'll try to push for more NCUC involvement.  Will go out to the
>> lists with more information shortly.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear Bruna, Michael
>> >
>> > Thank you for your comments.
>> > As soon as all EC finalize their comments on proposals we can get back
>> > to presenters with the requests and results of evaluation.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Renata
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Btw, I approve all three CROP requests but I would like for the LAC and
>> >> Africa ones to have more consistent outreach plans.
>> >>
>> >> 2018-02-26 10:45 GMT-03:00 Bruna Martins dos Santos <
>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Renata, one short clarification: Having read all the proposals now I
>> >>> wanted to make clear that I did not object to any of them.
>> >>> I just think we could suggest adaptations to both of them - thats why
>> I
>> >>> had questions with regards to time in the LAC one and outreach in
>> both. If
>> >>> we asked Ayden to better describe outreach plans in his CROP proposal
>> why
>> >>> shouldnt we ask Roxanne and Liz ?  I find it necessary to clear up my
>> >>> considerations because (a) I dont think I am going beyond my EC role
>> when I
>> >>> write them and (b) these members will most likely get their CROP
>> requests
>> >>> approved and will get to represent NCUC in a forum so we should raise
>> the
>> >>> bar and make some requirements when it comes to the Constituency
>> >>> representation.
>> >>>
>> >>> One question though: were the Africa and LAC proposals approved to the
>> >>> respective programmes ? You wrote on your email that the LACNIC one
>> was in
>> >>> provisional acceptance, what about the Africa one?
>> >>>
>> >>> I would also like all of those who took the time to send the email to
>> the
>> >>> list supporting both proposals taking the time to suggest outreach
>> ideas.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> B.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2018-02-26 10:18 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <
>> mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I vote to approve the CROP LAC LACNIC29 + LACNOG and the CROP AF -
>> Africa
>> >>>> Internet Summit. Both look good, and I'm pleased that there's been
>> such
>> >>>> strong collaboration among the community in developing these
>> proposals.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Michael
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> >>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Answers inline.
>> >>>>> Short answer: all proposals were sent both to general list and EC
>> list.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >>>>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> My comments are under each CROP
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> CROP AF - Africa Internet Summit
>> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008807.html
>> >>>>>> Sent date 7Feb
>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal: to be sent until 2March, sent to
>> NCUC-Discuss
>> >>>>>> and NCUC-EC
>> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Liz Orembo
>> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Vote: The applicant doesnt quite describe her outreach plans in her
>> >>>>>> application: " This time I plan to work with the regional
>> engagement teams
>> >>>>>> on ICANN sessions, main focus this time will be on NCUC and its
>> role at
>> >>>>>> ICANN. I'm also planning on sending a presentation proposal. Until
>> 2 March
>> >>>>>> this can be done. I'll try to build this presentation with NCUC
>> members" -
>> >>>>>> this feels a little empty. Also her presentation proposal is not
>> listed on
>> >>>>>> the email, was it approved ?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [RAR] I believe when proposer sent this application the details for
>> AIS
>> >>>>> proposal weren't posted yet. Now they have and she did, sent to
>> regional
>> >>>>> list, main list and EC and received no objections. However, lots of
>> >>>>> collaboration in the document
>> >>>>> Proposal document
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-c6tsMtWCxBDHtbFL9OsGy6U
>> uz1rzpx2qpgARR4SQbg/edit
>> >>>>> Discussion on regional list Feb 14
>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-af/2018-February/000256.html
>> >>>>> Proposal on main list Feb 19
>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-February/
>> 043731.html
>> >>>>> Proposal on EC list Feb 20
>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008897.html
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> CROP LAC - LACNIC29 + LACNOG
>> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008806.html
>> >>>>>> Sent date 7Feb
>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposals: 2
>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: provisional acceptance
>> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Roxanne John
>> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Vote: Yes with conditions! Presentation proposal looks consistent
>> and
>> >>>>>> is very good, apart from that 5 min for 3 speakers looks too
>> little time. On
>> >>>>>> a side note, I would like the applicant to be more active on the
>> general
>> >>>>>> presentation and less of a presenter or moderator (the proposal
>> doesnt quite
>> >>>>>> state who will be doing what). I also see no outreach plan such as
>> (a) draft
>> >>>>>> members, (b) participate on discussions on behalf of ncuc or any
>> other
>> >>>>>> possibility, the idea of developing outreach with GSE and not the
>> >>>>>> constituency also seems a little off - Given that the member is
>> from the LAC
>> >>>>>> region, I would love if she could send her proposal to the list
>> asking for
>> >>>>>> input.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [RAR] Proposals were also sent to list and received comments. I am
>> >>>>> co-author of proposals.
>> >>>>> Note that these proposals are only flash talk readouts of reports of
>> >>>>> work NCUC did at IGF2017 and will do at WSIS.
>> >>>>> Proposer will indicate, through her readout, what were the issues
>> >>>>> discussed by NCUC at these venues and who did that discussion.
>> >>>>> Also there is an idea of remote presentation by key policy people in
>> >>>>> NCUC via a short video.
>> >>>>> If the proposal is approved the arrangements for this will be made.
>> >>>>> Proposal document (IGF2017 is the concrete one right now as we are
>> >>>>> waiting for WSIS results)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iHn-npOfO4Q6WmBP3a5QU3A-
>> rDoGiSaAlh2d5Vcgufo/edit
>> >>>>> Proposal sent to list
>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-February/
>> 043619.html
>> >>>>> Proposal sent to EC list
>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008806.html
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> CROP NA - Rightscon
>> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-December/008643.html
>> >>>>>> Sent date 17 Dec
>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal: 1
>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: Accepted
>> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Michael Karanicolas
>> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Vote: Yes! This is the most developed CROP proposal of them all
>> but one
>> >>>>>> point for consideration would be to include other NCUC member in
>> attendance
>> >>>>>> both in the Panel composition and in the management of the booth -
>> but for
>> >>>>>> this we probably to have wait for the RightsCon funding requests
>> to come
>> >>>>>> back.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> best,
>> >>>>>> b
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> +55 61 99252-6512
>> >>>>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>> >>>>>> @boomartins
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >>>
>> >>> +55 61 99252-6512
>> >>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>> >>> @boomartins
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >>
>> >> +55 61 99252-6512
>> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>> >> @boomartins
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>
> +55 61 99252-6512 <+55%2061%2099252-6512>
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180226/fd0aada6/attachment.html>