[NCUC-EC] reminder: CROP proposals in evaluation

Mon Feb 26 16:51:28 CET 2018

Thanks for the update, Michael! Yep, I guess its both fortunate and
unfortunate the merger, but I am sure good things can come out of this !

2018-02-26 11:35 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:

> Great. By the way, Bruna, your comment on NCUC participation is well
> taken, but I've also just today heard back from RightsCon saying they
> want to merge this session in together with one that's been proposed
> by Xianhong Hu from UNESCO.
>
> On the one hand, this may provide a good boost to attendance, and
> allow an interesting collaboration opportunity. On the other hand, it
> obviously reduces our "control" over the session and its participants.
> Still, I'll try to push for more NCUC involvement.  Will go out to the
> lists with more information shortly.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Bruna, Michael
> >
> > Thank you for your comments.
> > As soon as all EC finalize their comments on proposals we can get back
> > to presenters with the requests and results of evaluation.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Renata
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Btw, I approve all three CROP requests but I would like for the LAC and
> >> Africa ones to have more consistent outreach plans.
> >>
> >> 2018-02-26 10:45 GMT-03:00 Bruna Martins dos Santos <
> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Renata, one short clarification: Having read all the proposals now I
> >>> wanted to make clear that I did not object to any of them.
> >>> I just think we could suggest adaptations to both of them - thats why I
> >>> had questions with regards to time in the LAC one and outreach in
> both. If
> >>> we asked Ayden to better describe outreach plans in his CROP proposal
> why
> >>> shouldnt we ask Roxanne and Liz ?  I find it necessary to clear up my
> >>> considerations because (a) I dont think I am going beyond my EC role
> when I
> >>> write them and (b) these members will most likely get their CROP
> requests
> >>> approved and will get to represent NCUC in a forum so we should raise
> the
> >>> bar and make some requirements when it comes to the Constituency
> >>> representation.
> >>>
> >>> One question though: were the Africa and LAC proposals approved to the
> >>> respective programmes ? You wrote on your email that the LACNIC one
> was in
> >>> provisional acceptance, what about the Africa one?
> >>>
> >>> I would also like all of those who took the time to send the email to
> the
> >>> list supporting both proposals taking the time to suggest outreach
> ideas.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> B.
> >>>
> >>> 2018-02-26 10:18 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I vote to approve the CROP LAC LACNIC29 + LACNOG and the CROP AF -
> Africa
> >>>> Internet Summit. Both look good, and I'm pleased that there's been
> such
> >>>> strong collaboration among the community in developing these
> proposals.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Answers inline.
> >>>>> Short answer: all proposals were sent both to general list and EC
> list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My comments are under each CROP
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CROP AF - Africa Internet Summit
> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008807.html
> >>>>>> Sent date 7Feb
> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal: to be sent until 2March, sent to NCUC-Discuss
> >>>>>> and NCUC-EC
> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Liz Orembo
> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vote: The applicant doesnt quite describe her outreach plans in her
> >>>>>> application: " This time I plan to work with the regional
> engagement teams
> >>>>>> on ICANN sessions, main focus this time will be on NCUC and its
> role at
> >>>>>> ICANN. I'm also planning on sending a presentation proposal. Until
> 2 March
> >>>>>> this can be done. I'll try to build this presentation with NCUC
> members" -
> >>>>>> this feels a little empty. Also her presentation proposal is not
> listed on
> >>>>>> the email, was it approved ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [RAR] I believe when proposer sent this application the details for
> AIS
> >>>>> proposal weren't posted yet. Now they have and she did, sent to
> regional
> >>>>> list, main list and EC and received no objections. However, lots of
> >>>>> collaboration in the document
> >>>>> Proposal document
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-c6tsMtWCxBDHtbFL9OsGy6Uuz1rzpx
> 2qpgARR4SQbg/edit
> >>>>> Discussion on regional list Feb 14
> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-af/2018-February/000256.html
> >>>>> Proposal on main list Feb 19
> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-
> February/043731.html
> >>>>> Proposal on EC list Feb 20
> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008897.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> CROP LAC - LACNIC29 + LACNOG
> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008806.html
> >>>>>> Sent date 7Feb
> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposals: 2
> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: provisional acceptance
> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Roxanne John
> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vote: Yes with conditions! Presentation proposal looks consistent
> and
> >>>>>> is very good, apart from that 5 min for 3 speakers looks too little
> time. On
> >>>>>> a side note, I would like the applicant to be more active on the
> general
> >>>>>> presentation and less of a presenter or moderator (the proposal
> doesnt quite
> >>>>>> state who will be doing what). I also see no outreach plan such as
> (a) draft
> >>>>>> members, (b) participate on discussions on behalf of ncuc or any
> other
> >>>>>> possibility, the idea of developing outreach with GSE and not the
> >>>>>> constituency also seems a little off - Given that the member is
> from the LAC
> >>>>>> region, I would love if she could send her proposal to the list
> asking for
> >>>>>> input.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [RAR] Proposals were also sent to list and received comments. I am
> >>>>> co-author of proposals.
> >>>>> Note that these proposals are only flash talk readouts of reports of
> >>>>> work NCUC did at IGF2017 and will do at WSIS.
> >>>>> Proposer will indicate, through her readout, what were the issues
> >>>>> discussed by NCUC at these venues and who did that discussion.
> >>>>> Also there is an idea of remote presentation by key policy people in
> >>>>> NCUC via a short video.
> >>>>> If the proposal is approved the arrangements for this will be made.
> >>>>> Proposal document (IGF2017 is the concrete one right now as we are
> >>>>> waiting for WSIS results)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iHn-npOfO4Q6WmBP3a5QU3A-
> rDoGiSaAlh2d5Vcgufo/edit
> >>>>> Proposal sent to list
> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-
> February/043619.html
> >>>>> Proposal sent to EC list
> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008806.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CROP NA - Rightscon
> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-December/008643.html
> >>>>>> Sent date 17 Dec
> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal: 1
> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: Accepted
> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Michael Karanicolas
> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vote: Yes! This is the most developed CROP proposal of them all but
> one
> >>>>>> point for consideration would be to include other NCUC member in
> attendance
> >>>>>> both in the Panel composition and in the management of the booth -
> but for
> >>>>>> this we probably to have wait for the RightsCon funding requests to
> come
> >>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> best,
> >>>>>> b
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +55 61 99252-6512
> >>>>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>>>> @boomartins
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>
> >>> +55 61 99252-6512
> >>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>> @boomartins
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>
> >> +55 61 99252-6512
> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >> @boomartins
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

+55 61 99252-6512
Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180226/3a36b758/attachment.html>