[NCUC-EC] Outreach proposals - about feedbacks

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi Tatiana

Google docs is a horrendous nightmare sometimes
I will see what is happening

In the meantime pls send it to my email

Tks

Em 20/01/2017 19:10, "Tatiana Tropina" <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Renata,
> thanks!
> I have only one proposal feedback pending because the structure of the doc
> didn't allow me to insert a feedback, it seems there is a problem with
> cells in the last line... I can send my feedback via email nevertheless. :-)
> Cheers
> Tanya
>
> On 21 January 2017 at 00:57, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> So we have some proposals for outreach and some feedbacks already
>> registered. Please bear w/ long email.
>>
>> Today is the last day for folks to send in alternatives to Rightscon,
>> and so far we just had 1, it's mine, so I'll stay out of judging it.
>>
>> For feedback of all the outreach proposals, I'd propose as follow:
>>
>> - Collating feedback from EC members into one email (w/ possible minor
>> editions to highlight only points which can help proposer move
>> forward)
>>
>> - If there is a funding request, feedback will follow this path:
>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if funding is still needed and how
>> much
>> ------ 2nd level response - email response is forwarded to EC, which
>> analyses it
>> ------ 3rd level response - EC response is forwarded to member
>>
>> - if there is a media request - social media or blog post
>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if still needed and what
>> ------ 2nd level response - email response forwarded to regional EC
>>
>> Intervals in which feedback is given: every month
>> So alternative to Rightscon response for CROPP and event funding for
>> Joburg request will go after this 20jan as soon as EC decides
>>
>> I can collate/edit text/responses (1st level response) but I guess
>> official final announcement of funding granted should come from chair
>> (3rd level response)
>>
>> There's also the issue of clarification of some feedbacks done by EC,
>> I've decided to add that in the sheet itself. Tatiana, added a comment
>> on one of your feedbacks.
>>
>> Farzaneh, Anna and Tatiana have few feedbacks pending.
>> David and Ines all
>> Ines was suggested to observe on some requests from Africa due to
>> region relatedness, should advise her thoughts. I agree on regional
>> relatedness but only 2nd level response.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Renata
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170120/462f24ef/attachment.html>