[NCUC-EC] Outreach proposals - about feedbacks

[Tatiana Tropina]

Hi Renata,
thanks!
I have only one proposal feedback pending because the structure of the doc
didn't allow me to insert a feedback, it seems there is a problem with
cells in the last line... I can send my feedback via email nevertheless. :-)
Cheers
Tanya

On 21 January 2017 at 00:57, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks
>
> So we have some proposals for outreach and some feedbacks already
> registered. Please bear w/ long email.
>
> Today is the last day for folks to send in alternatives to Rightscon,
> and so far we just had 1, it's mine, so I'll stay out of judging it.
>
> For feedback of all the outreach proposals, I'd propose as follow:
>
> - Collating feedback from EC members into one email (w/ possible minor
> editions to highlight only points which can help proposer move
> forward)
>
> - If there is a funding request, feedback will follow this path:
> ------ 1st level response - confirm if funding is still needed and how much
> ------ 2nd level response - email response is forwarded to EC, which
> analyses it
> ------ 3rd level response - EC response is forwarded to member
>
> - if there is a media request - social media or blog post
> ------ 1st level response - confirm if still needed and what
> ------ 2nd level response - email response forwarded to regional EC
>
> Intervals in which feedback is given: every month
> So alternative to Rightscon response for CROPP and event funding for
> Joburg request will go after this 20jan as soon as EC decides
>
> I can collate/edit text/responses (1st level response) but I guess
> official final announcement of funding granted should come from chair
> (3rd level response)
>
> There's also the issue of clarification of some feedbacks done by EC,
> I've decided to add that in the sheet itself. Tatiana, added a comment
> on one of your feedbacks.
>
> Farzaneh, Anna and Tatiana have few feedbacks pending.
> David and Ines all
> Ines was suggested to observe on some requests from Africa due to
> region relatedness, should advise her thoughts. I agree on regional
> relatedness but only 2nd level response.
>
> Thanks
>
> Renata
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170121/1a484638/attachment.html>