[NCUC-EC] Outreach proposals - about feedbacks

[hfaiedh ines]

Hi Renata, just double-checking the docs we r talking about, it s this one
right?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15UobRJCeF1d8Y15z9aEnxf1WuqO4ubhFx9kIcBrGAqI/edit?ts=5871a905#gid=1177298805

2017-01-20 19:43 GMT-05:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:

> Hi Tatiana
>
> Google docs is a horrendous nightmare sometimes
> I will see what is happening
>
> In the meantime pls send it to my email
>
> Tks
>
> Em 20/01/2017 19:10, "Tatiana Tropina" <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Renata,
>> thanks!
>> I have only one proposal feedback pending because the structure of the
>> doc didn't allow me to insert a feedback, it seems there is a problem with
>> cells in the last line... I can send my feedback via email nevertheless. :-)
>> Cheers
>> Tanya
>>
>> On 21 January 2017 at 00:57, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> So we have some proposals for outreach and some feedbacks already
>>> registered. Please bear w/ long email.
>>>
>>> Today is the last day for folks to send in alternatives to Rightscon,
>>> and so far we just had 1, it's mine, so I'll stay out of judging it.
>>>
>>> For feedback of all the outreach proposals, I'd propose as follow:
>>>
>>> - Collating feedback from EC members into one email (w/ possible minor
>>> editions to highlight only points which can help proposer move
>>> forward)
>>>
>>> - If there is a funding request, feedback will follow this path:
>>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if funding is still needed and how
>>> much
>>> ------ 2nd level response - email response is forwarded to EC, which
>>> analyses it
>>> ------ 3rd level response - EC response is forwarded to member
>>>
>>> - if there is a media request - social media or blog post
>>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if still needed and what
>>> ------ 2nd level response - email response forwarded to regional EC
>>>
>>> Intervals in which feedback is given: every month
>>> So alternative to Rightscon response for CROPP and event funding for
>>> Joburg request will go after this 20jan as soon as EC decides
>>>
>>> I can collate/edit text/responses (1st level response) but I guess
>>> official final announcement of funding granted should come from chair
>>> (3rd level response)
>>>
>>> There's also the issue of clarification of some feedbacks done by EC,
>>> I've decided to add that in the sheet itself. Tatiana, added a comment
>>> on one of your feedbacks.
>>>
>>> Farzaneh, Anna and Tatiana have few feedbacks pending.
>>> David and Ines all
>>> Ines was suggested to observe on some requests from Africa due to
>>> region relatedness, should advise her thoughts. I agree on regional
>>> relatedness but only 2nd level response.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Renata
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170120/f18561fa/attachment.html>