[NCUC-EC] Outreach proposals - about feedbacks

[hfaiedh ines]

and sorry I can't find where I was suggested to observe Africa requests, I
can't find this detail anywhere so that I know what members from Africa
want me to do exactly.

Thank you very much.

2017-01-20 19:54 GMT-05:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:

> Hi Renata, just double-checking the docs we r talking about, it s this one
> right?
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15UobRJCeF1d8Y15z9aEnxf1WuqO4u
> bhFx9kIcBrGAqI/edit?ts=5871a905#gid=1177298805
>
> 2017-01-20 19:43 GMT-05:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Tatiana
>>
>> Google docs is a horrendous nightmare sometimes
>> I will see what is happening
>>
>> In the meantime pls send it to my email
>>
>> Tks
>>
>> Em 20/01/2017 19:10, "Tatiana Tropina" <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi Renata,
>>> thanks!
>>> I have only one proposal feedback pending because the structure of the
>>> doc didn't allow me to insert a feedback, it seems there is a problem with
>>> cells in the last line... I can send my feedback via email nevertheless. :-)
>>> Cheers
>>> Tanya
>>>
>>> On 21 January 2017 at 00:57, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi folks
>>>>
>>>> So we have some proposals for outreach and some feedbacks already
>>>> registered. Please bear w/ long email.
>>>>
>>>> Today is the last day for folks to send in alternatives to Rightscon,
>>>> and so far we just had 1, it's mine, so I'll stay out of judging it.
>>>>
>>>> For feedback of all the outreach proposals, I'd propose as follow:
>>>>
>>>> - Collating feedback from EC members into one email (w/ possible minor
>>>> editions to highlight only points which can help proposer move
>>>> forward)
>>>>
>>>> - If there is a funding request, feedback will follow this path:
>>>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if funding is still needed and how
>>>> much
>>>> ------ 2nd level response - email response is forwarded to EC, which
>>>> analyses it
>>>> ------ 3rd level response - EC response is forwarded to member
>>>>
>>>> - if there is a media request - social media or blog post
>>>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if still needed and what
>>>> ------ 2nd level response - email response forwarded to regional EC
>>>>
>>>> Intervals in which feedback is given: every month
>>>> So alternative to Rightscon response for CROPP and event funding for
>>>> Joburg request will go after this 20jan as soon as EC decides
>>>>
>>>> I can collate/edit text/responses (1st level response) but I guess
>>>> official final announcement of funding granted should come from chair
>>>> (3rd level response)
>>>>
>>>> There's also the issue of clarification of some feedbacks done by EC,
>>>> I've decided to add that in the sheet itself. Tatiana, added a comment
>>>> on one of your feedbacks.
>>>>
>>>> Farzaneh, Anna and Tatiana have few feedbacks pending.
>>>> David and Ines all
>>>> Ines was suggested to observe on some requests from Africa due to
>>>> region relatedness, should advise her thoughts. I agree on regional
>>>> relatedness but only 2nd level response.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Renata
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170120/2761cd42/attachment.html>