[NCUC-EC] Outreach proposals - about feedbacks

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi

I've written in pvt. Write to me again if you have any doubts

Em 20/01/2017 20:00, "hfaiedh ines" <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com> escreveu:

> and sorry I can't find where I was suggested to observe Africa requests, I
> can't find this detail anywhere so that I know what members from Africa
> want me to do exactly.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> 2017-01-20 19:54 GMT-05:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Renata, just double-checking the docs we r talking about, it s this
>> one right?
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15UobRJCeF1d8Y15z9aEn
>> xf1WuqO4ubhFx9kIcBrGAqI/edit?ts=5871a905#gid=1177298805
>>
>> 2017-01-20 19:43 GMT-05:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Tatiana
>>>
>>> Google docs is a horrendous nightmare sometimes
>>> I will see what is happening
>>>
>>> In the meantime pls send it to my email
>>>
>>> Tks
>>>
>>> Em 20/01/2017 19:10, "Tatiana Tropina" <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hi Renata,
>>>> thanks!
>>>> I have only one proposal feedback pending because the structure of the
>>>> doc didn't allow me to insert a feedback, it seems there is a problem with
>>>> cells in the last line... I can send my feedback via email nevertheless. :-)
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Tanya
>>>>
>>>> On 21 January 2017 at 00:57, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks
>>>>>
>>>>> So we have some proposals for outreach and some feedbacks already
>>>>> registered. Please bear w/ long email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Today is the last day for folks to send in alternatives to Rightscon,
>>>>> and so far we just had 1, it's mine, so I'll stay out of judging it.
>>>>>
>>>>> For feedback of all the outreach proposals, I'd propose as follow:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Collating feedback from EC members into one email (w/ possible minor
>>>>> editions to highlight only points which can help proposer move
>>>>> forward)
>>>>>
>>>>> - If there is a funding request, feedback will follow this path:
>>>>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if funding is still needed and how
>>>>> much
>>>>> ------ 2nd level response - email response is forwarded to EC, which
>>>>> analyses it
>>>>> ------ 3rd level response - EC response is forwarded to member
>>>>>
>>>>> - if there is a media request - social media or blog post
>>>>> ------ 1st level response - confirm if still needed and what
>>>>> ------ 2nd level response - email response forwarded to regional EC
>>>>>
>>>>> Intervals in which feedback is given: every month
>>>>> So alternative to Rightscon response for CROPP and event funding for
>>>>> Joburg request will go after this 20jan as soon as EC decides
>>>>>
>>>>> I can collate/edit text/responses (1st level response) but I guess
>>>>> official final announcement of funding granted should come from chair
>>>>> (3rd level response)
>>>>>
>>>>> There's also the issue of clarification of some feedbacks done by EC,
>>>>> I've decided to add that in the sheet itself. Tatiana, added a comment
>>>>> on one of your feedbacks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Farzaneh, Anna and Tatiana have few feedbacks pending.
>>>>> David and Ines all
>>>>> Ines was suggested to observe on some requests from Africa due to
>>>>> region relatedness, should advise her thoughts. I agree on regional
>>>>> relatedness but only 2nd level response.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Renata
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170120/e3f8d826/attachment.html>