[NCUC-EC] Planning the schedule for Copenhagen

[Tatiana Tropina]

Hi Farzy,
I totally agree with this approach - let's make it more structural and
working-groups processes oriented than constituency-oriented. During the
constituency day, we rather provide some overview of the "topics",
depending on hot issues and availability of NCUC members who are a part of
those groups than really structure and deep-dive. So I do support all three
sessions. We can think on how to structure and focus the 3rd one, I think
it might be a really important and interesting one.
Others - GAC and Policy support are interesting by default.
Cheers
Tanya

On 2 January 2017 at 22:54, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tatiana,
>
> I think it would be good to meet with Markus. should we have a general
> meeting with him with members or just EC, PC reps etc? Good point on the
> PDP. my idea was to highlight the various working groups  better and make
> it more focused instead of cramming it into the constituency. But I
> understand where you are coming from. Perhaps we can just highlight it
> better during the constituency day.
>
> EC will have a stand alone meeting too but that would be a lovely
> breakfast at 7 am one beautiful morning.  I will give you the details later.
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Farzy,
>>
>> thanks a lot for this detailed email! All three look good to me, though
>> it seems that for the 3rd one we might have to make it clear what would be
>> the difference with those meetings at constituency day, because there might
>> be some overlaps in updates, policy issues, etc. So having a clear focus
>> will be cool, and I like the suggestion to make it a separate meeting.
>>
>> A quick question for the NCUC EC level meetings - I know that we as a SG
>> have NCSG-Board meeting (so not on NCUC level) but I remember that at some
>> ICANN meetings there was always something like NCUC EC meeting with
>> particular board members. Is there any need to book a slot for that one as
>> well (Board members-EC)? Are we going to have it anyway? Just wondering.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tanya
>>
>> On 2 January 2017 at 22:17, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> The schedule planning for Copenhagen has started. We did not submit any
>>> high-interest topic for Copenhagen as far as I know. The next planning
>>> meeting which is for SO/AC leaders will take place on Wed. I asked Tatiana
>>> to kindly be my alternate since I cannot make it and have a compulsory
>>> employee's orientation session at Gtech.
>>>
>>> They will discuss the high-interest session topics and choose some. We
>>> don't have the topics yet and they will be discussed during the meeting.
>>>
>>> Also we are going to receive the meeting request form soon which we will
>>> have to fill in within a week. so time is tight. I think it's a good idea
>>> to ask the members for suggestions what needs to be discussed:
>>>
>>> I have the following meetings  in mind, which I think we can also
>>> discuss with Tapani and see if we can do it combined with NCSG
>>>
>>> Meeting with GAC and GNSO GAC liaison (possibly at NCSG level)
>>>
>>> NCUC Policy Development Support
>>>
>>> NCUC Activities in various Working Groups, and the pressing public
>>> comments (covering our performance, how to get more engaged and a more
>>> focus on PDP within NCUC
>>>
>>> I think three separate meetings are quite enough plus we have the
>>> constituency day for around 4 hours too which we need to arrange.
>>>
>>> I can send this to NCUC mailing list. If you have any other suggestions
>>> please send either here or on the mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170102/cc108bd5/attachment.html>