[NCUC-EC] Planning the schedule for Copenhagen

hfaiedh ines hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 4 02:11:41 CET 2017


I like the ideas you both suggested and would also be in favor of a meeting
with ICANN Board.

2017-01-02 17:14 GMT-05:00 Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>:

> Hi Farzy,
> I totally agree with this approach - let's make it more structural and
> working-groups processes oriented than constituency-oriented. During the
> constituency day, we rather provide some overview of the "topics",
> depending on hot issues and availability of NCUC members who are a part of
> those groups than really structure and deep-dive. So I do support all three
> sessions. We can think on how to structure and focus the 3rd one, I think
> it might be a really important and interesting one.
> Others - GAC and Policy support are interesting by default.
> Cheers
> Tanya
>
> On 2 January 2017 at 22:54, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tatiana,
>>
>> I think it would be good to meet with Markus. should we have a general
>> meeting with him with members or just EC, PC reps etc? Good point on the
>> PDP. my idea was to highlight the various working groups  better and make
>> it more focused instead of cramming it into the constituency. But I
>> understand where you are coming from. Perhaps we can just highlight it
>> better during the constituency day.
>>
>> EC will have a stand alone meeting too but that would be a lovely
>> breakfast at 7 am one beautiful morning.  I will give you the details later.
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Tatiana Tropina <
>> tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Farzy,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot for this detailed email! All three look good to me, though
>>> it seems that for the 3rd one we might have to make it clear what would be
>>> the difference with those meetings at constituency day, because there might
>>> be some overlaps in updates, policy issues, etc. So having a clear focus
>>> will be cool, and I like the suggestion to make it a separate meeting.
>>>
>>> A quick question for the NCUC EC level meetings - I know that we as a SG
>>> have NCSG-Board meeting (so not on NCUC level) but I remember that at some
>>> ICANN meetings there was always something like NCUC EC meeting with
>>> particular board members. Is there any need to book a slot for that one as
>>> well (Board members-EC)? Are we going to have it anyway? Just wondering.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Tanya
>>>
>>> On 2 January 2017 at 22:17, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> The schedule planning for Copenhagen has started. We did not submit any
>>>> high-interest topic for Copenhagen as far as I know. The next planning
>>>> meeting which is for SO/AC leaders will take place on Wed. I asked Tatiana
>>>> to kindly be my alternate since I cannot make it and have a compulsory
>>>> employee's orientation session at Gtech.
>>>>
>>>> They will discuss the high-interest session topics and choose some. We
>>>> don't have the topics yet and they will be discussed during the meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Also we are going to receive the meeting request form soon which we
>>>> will have to fill in within a week. so time is tight. I think it's a good
>>>> idea to ask the members for suggestions what needs to be discussed:
>>>>
>>>> I have the following meetings  in mind, which I think we can also
>>>> discuss with Tapani and see if we can do it combined with NCSG
>>>>
>>>> Meeting with GAC and GNSO GAC liaison (possibly at NCSG level)
>>>>
>>>> NCUC Policy Development Support
>>>>
>>>> NCUC Activities in various Working Groups, and the pressing public
>>>> comments (covering our performance, how to get more engaged and a more
>>>> focus on PDP within NCUC
>>>>
>>>> I think three separate meetings are quite enough plus we have the
>>>> constituency day for around 4 hours too which we need to arrange.
>>>>
>>>> I can send this to NCUC mailing list. If you have any other suggestions
>>>> please send either here or on the mailing list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170103/8dd38303/attachment.html>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list