[NCUC-EC] Planning the schedule for Copenhagen

[farzaneh badii]

Hi Tatiana,

I think it would be good to meet with Markus. should we have a general
meeting with him with members or just EC, PC reps etc? Good point on the
PDP. my idea was to highlight the various working groups  better and make
it more focused instead of cramming it into the constituency. But I
understand where you are coming from. Perhaps we can just highlight it
better during the constituency day.

EC will have a stand alone meeting too but that would be a lovely breakfast
at 7 am one beautiful morning.  I will give you the details later.

Farzaneh

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Farzy,
>
> thanks a lot for this detailed email! All three look good to me, though it
> seems that for the 3rd one we might have to make it clear what would be the
> difference with those meetings at constituency day, because there might be
> some overlaps in updates, policy issues, etc. So having a clear focus will
> be cool, and I like the suggestion to make it a separate meeting.
>
> A quick question for the NCUC EC level meetings - I know that we as a SG
> have NCSG-Board meeting (so not on NCUC level) but I remember that at some
> ICANN meetings there was always something like NCUC EC meeting with
> particular board members. Is there any need to book a slot for that one as
> well (Board members-EC)? Are we going to have it anyway? Just wondering.
>
> Cheers
> Tanya
>
> On 2 January 2017 at 22:17, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> The schedule planning for Copenhagen has started. We did not submit any
>> high-interest topic for Copenhagen as far as I know. The next planning
>> meeting which is for SO/AC leaders will take place on Wed. I asked Tatiana
>> to kindly be my alternate since I cannot make it and have a compulsory
>> employee's orientation session at Gtech.
>>
>> They will discuss the high-interest session topics and choose some. We
>> don't have the topics yet and they will be discussed during the meeting.
>>
>> Also we are going to receive the meeting request form soon which we will
>> have to fill in within a week. so time is tight. I think it's a good idea
>> to ask the members for suggestions what needs to be discussed:
>>
>> I have the following meetings  in mind, which I think we can also discuss
>> with Tapani and see if we can do it combined with NCSG
>>
>> Meeting with GAC and GNSO GAC liaison (possibly at NCSG level)
>>
>> NCUC Policy Development Support
>>
>> NCUC Activities in various Working Groups, and the pressing public
>> comments (covering our performance, how to get more engaged and a more
>> focus on PDP within NCUC
>>
>> I think three separate meetings are quite enough plus we have the
>> constituency day for around 4 hours too which we need to arrange.
>>
>> I can send this to NCUC mailing list. If you have any other suggestions
>> please send either here or on the mailing list.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170102/adc9a784/attachment.html>