[NCUC-EC] copenhagen

[farzaneh badii]

It seems like I am out of my timezone and did not consider this time
difference. Sorry about that.

the problem is that at the moment we don't have  a set of criteria and a
specific process for allocating these travel slots to the EC. So in the
beginning and since there is an urgent need to assign the travel slot, have
to go with first come first served basis unless EC can discuss among
themselves and see if someone can forgo a travel slot in favor of the
other. I suggest discussing the process of allocating EC members travel
slots in our first EC call and come up with a solution.

That said, you can have my travel slot. I will submit your name soon.
Renata cannot make it and Tatiana has kindly suggested that she will source
funding for this trip through other means. So I think we are good for
Copenhagen and we can discuss the allocation of travel slot to EC in a call
for future meetings.

Best

Farzaneh

On 9 December 2016 at 00:17, David Cake <dave at davecake.net> wrote:

> So - looks like the question was asked after 10 pm my time, and then
> requests submitted before 8am my time, so I’d only have got a chance to
> respond if I checked and responded to email after 10 pm on a night when I
> was not expecting anything important.
>
> I know ICANN is fairly 24 hours, but this is a bit ridiculous.
>
> Could we please try to keep to at a minimum 24 hour turnarounds on things
> like this? I know ICANN my give us a tight turnaround on requests, but they
> need to understand that we need time as well, and really 1 days delay this
> far out from a meeting isn’t going to make any difference.
>
> David
>
>
>
> On 9 Dec. 2016, at 7:22 am, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Seems like I have to send the names today. since I have not received any
> other requests I will submit Anna and Ines names. if I can know in a couple
> of hours if another slot is available will let to know.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On 8 Dec 2016 1:29 p.m., "Anna Loup" <aloup at usc.edu> wrote:
>
>> I will be able to attend as well. I will send my official statement later
>> today.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Anna
>>
>> --
>> Masters in Public Diplomacy '16
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2016, 07:33 -0800, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>,
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Farzaneh and all,
>>
>> I am available to attend the Copenhagen meeting .
>> For the time being, I don't have other sources of funding to attend so I
>> will get back to you later today with a detailed email on my participation.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Le jeudi 8 décembre 2016, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Farzy and all,
>>> Since it is in Europe (close to me) I will try to find funding for
>>> myself, in the worst case self-funding. So don't need the slot.
>>> Thanks for trying to free up your slot, would be fantastic to bring
>>> those EC members who live far away.
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Tanya
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8 Dec 2016 08:11, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone
>>>
>>> We have three travel slots assigned by icann to ncuc ec for each icann
>>> meeting. normally one slot goes to the chair and two slots go to the ec
>>> members on rotating basis. This means that the chair gets funded for every
>>> meeting but ec members receive travel slots on rotating basis i.e if you
>>> get one for this meeting you won't be eligible for the next unless other ec
>>> members do not want the travel slot.
>>>
>>> I am trying to see if I can free up my travel slot by getting funding
>>> from other sources. But for now we have two travel slots available. if you
>>> want travel support for Copenhagen just respond to this email. you need to
>>> also provide a brief justification as to why you want to be there for
>>> example if you are engaged with working groups etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ncuc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgMFaQ&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_Qrtek1FqfDQOL5aEw&m=_oSHw0bVQdwa0sl9hIc5XvYUM09AjOM3LNKsRsuLdnM&s=un7_-c_WH-ty7Uw_TUbW-HYTt6pbJv4CGnu_kbSgVDY&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.nc
>> uc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgIGaQ&c=clK7k
>> QUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_Qrtek1FqfDQOL5
>> aEw&m=_oSHw0bVQdwa0sl9hIc5XvYUM09AjOM3LNKsRsuLdnM&s=un7_-c_W
>> H-ty7Uw_TUbW-HYTt6pbJv4CGnu_kbSgVDY&e=
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20161209/7ee9ae9c/attachment.html>