[NCUC-EC] copenhagen

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi

I will make it to Copenhagen.
I am fortunate to have found a funding source to go to Europe through
other means than ICANN and will use it to go to ICANN58

Best

Renata



On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 2:07 AM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like I am out of my timezone and did not consider this time
> difference. Sorry about that.
>
> the problem is that at the moment we don't have  a set of criteria and a
> specific process for allocating these travel slots to the EC. So in the
> beginning and since there is an urgent need to assign the travel slot, have
> to go with first come first served basis unless EC can discuss among
> themselves and see if someone can forgo a travel slot in favor of the other.
> I suggest discussing the process of allocating EC members travel slots in
> our first EC call and come up with a solution.
>
> That said, you can have my travel slot. I will submit your name soon. Renata
> cannot make it and Tatiana has kindly suggested that she will source funding
> for this trip through other means. So I think we are good for Copenhagen and
> we can discuss the allocation of travel slot to EC in a call for future
> meetings.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On 9 December 2016 at 00:17, David Cake <dave at davecake.net> wrote:
>>
>> So - looks like the question was asked after 10 pm my time, and then
>> requests submitted before 8am my time, so I’d only have got a chance to
>> respond if I checked and responded to email after 10 pm on a night when I
>> was not expecting anything important.
>>
>> I know ICANN is fairly 24 hours, but this is a bit ridiculous.
>>
>> Could we please try to keep to at a minimum 24 hour turnarounds on things
>> like this? I know ICANN my give us a tight turnaround on requests, but they
>> need to understand that we need time as well, and really 1 days delay this
>> far out from a meeting isn’t going to make any difference.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9 Dec. 2016, at 7:22 am, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Seems like I have to send the names today. since I have not received any
>> other requests I will submit Anna and Ines names. if I can know in a couple
>> of hours if another slot is available will let to know.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>> On 8 Dec 2016 1:29 p.m., "Anna Loup" <aloup at usc.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> I will be able to attend as well. I will send my official statement later
>>> today.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Anna
>>>
>>> --
>>> Masters in Public Diplomacy '16
>>>
>>> On Dec 8, 2016, 07:33 -0800, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>,
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Farzaneh and all,
>>>
>>> I am available to attend the Copenhagen meeting .
>>> For the time being, I don't have other sources of funding to attend so I
>>> will get back to you later today with a detailed email on my participation.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Le jeudi 8 décembre 2016, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hi Farzy and all,
>>>> Since it is in Europe (close to me) I will try to find funding for
>>>> myself, in the worst case self-funding. So don't need the slot.
>>>> Thanks for trying to free up your slot, would be fantastic to bring
>>>> those EC members who live far away.
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Tanya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8 Dec 2016 08:11, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone
>>>>
>>>> We have three travel slots assigned by icann to ncuc ec for each icann
>>>> meeting. normally one slot goes to the chair and two slots go to the ec
>>>> members on rotating basis. This means that the chair gets funded for every
>>>> meeting but ec members receive travel slots on rotating basis i.e if you get
>>>> one for this meeting you won't be eligible for the next unless other ec
>>>> members do not want the travel slot.
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to see if I can free up my travel slot by getting funding
>>>> from other sources. But for now we have two travel slots available. if you
>>>> want travel support for Copenhagen just respond to this email. you need to
>>>> also provide a brief justification as to why you want to be there for
>>>> example if you are engaged with working groups etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ncuc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgIGaQ&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_Qrtek1FqfDQOL5aEw&m=_oSHw0bVQdwa0sl9hIc5XvYUM09AjOM3LNKsRsuLdnM&s=un7_-c_WH-ty7Uw_TUbW-HYTt6pbJv4CGnu_kbSgVDY&e=
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>