[NCUC-DISCUSS] Extended - IMPORTANT: [Call for volunteers] ICANNFellowship Program Community Consultation

[caleb olumuyiwa]

Thank you Ayden,

Since you can view the document, you can still post your comments to the
pen holders and the NCUC chair for collation.

I hope you are able to make your valuable contributions on time.

Regards

Caleb



On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:

> Hi Caleb,
>
> I have repeatedly pressed that button in Google Docs for two weeks now,
> and have not been granted access to edit the document. Are only fellows
> being permitted to edit the document? Are these the only contributions
> being sought?
>
> The gist of my remarks - which you refer to as my 'perception', and I
> suppose it is, but I think it is an informed perception - was that in a
> consultation where we are being asked 19 questions, we have responded to
> five of the questions, and ignored the other 14. Of the five questions that
> do have responses, I believe our response falls short of the standard of
> other comments that the NCSG/NCUC/NPOC have previously submitted.
>
> While I have not been an ICANN fellow, I did take the pen on more than
> half of our public comments last year and would like to think that I have a
> bit of an idea as to how to write one. It is my view that it is always
> helpful to respond to the (direct) questions being asked.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On April 5, 2018 1:36 PM, caleb olumuyiwa <muyiwacaleb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Ayden,
>
> You can still make some contribution to the document if you request for
> access.  Your contributions are vital and I believe in the
> multistakeholder process of consultation.
>
> Despite your perception about the suitability, it is rather vital to have
> your inputs to represent the community stance while we still can.
>
> See below a request for access to the document you can make.
> Thank you
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Renata,
>>
>> Thank you for your message.
>>
>> I disagree that there have been "many interventions" to this document.
>> The Google Doc is in read-only mode, and I was not granted edit access, so
>> I have not been able to share my contributions to the proposed text.
>>
>> Of the 13 pages, 9 pages are copied and pasted from other sources and do
>> not relate to the questionnaire at hand. Of the 19 questions we have been
>> asked to answer, most (14) have not been responded to, and those 5 with
>> answers seem under-developed.
>>
>> We have already received one extension. This questionnaire was circulated
>> on the NCSG list in January, and I do not believe the text that I see in
>> the Google Doc today represents the view of the broader NCUC membership. I
>> think it would be inappropriate for the EC to submit this, given the
>> document has not been open to all members to edit, that the text is not
>> final, and responses are not offered to a majority of the 19 questions
>> being asked.
>>
>> A fortnight ago I requested, very modestly, that the membership have at
>> least 24 hours to review the final text before the EC considers endorsing
>> and submitting it. I am disappointed that this will not be the case. This
>> is not how we used to work.
>>
>> I respectfully suggest that this response is under-developed and not
>> suitable for submission on behalf of the NCUC. This is not a criticism of
>> anyone (I thank those who have worked on this document), it is just the
>> reality that we can't meet the deadline.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>
>> On April 5, 2018 1:14 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Ayden
>> >
>> > Yes, the deadline is 6th April.
>> >
>> > I'll send the document today to the EC.
>> >
>> > There are 13 pages on the document with many interventions.
>> >
>> > I will try to get an extra extension for this comment but seems
>> unlikely.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Renata
>> >
>> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> >
>> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> >
>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Ogundele Olumuyiwa Caleb*
> *muyiwacaleb at gmail.com <muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>*
> *234 - 8077377378*
> *234 - 07030777969*
>
>
>


-- 
*Ogundele Olumuyiwa Caleb*
*muyiwacaleb at gmail.com <muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>*
*234 - 8077377378*
*234 - 07030777969*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180405/2ac03ab6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 314779 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180405/2ac03ab6/attachment.png>