[NCUC-DISCUSS] Extended - IMPORTANT: [Call for volunteers] ICANNFellowship Program Community Consultation

[Liz Orembo]

I see the draft was shared 10 days ago and in the first email of this
thread, there were instructions to change settings to allow for comments
and suggestions. Considering that the deadline to submit comments is
tomorrow, I still think anyone can still input into the doc and the
penholders can work on incorporating comments into the draft.

If we had more time, I would suggest that the penholders compile and
summarise the comments received from fellows, for clarity and to protect
the identity of the fellows. (if that was the intention by hiding the
names)

@Ayden, I wish you raised the access concerns as soon as you experienced
the challenges.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Hi Renata,
>
> Thank you for your message.
>
> I disagree that there have been "many interventions" to this document. The
> Google Doc is in read-only mode, and I was not granted edit access, so I
> have not been able to share my contributions to the proposed text.
>
> Of the 13 pages, 9 pages are copied and pasted from other sources and do
> not relate to the questionnaire at hand. Of the 19 questions we have been
> asked to answer, most (14) have not been responded to, and those 5 with
> answers seem under-developed.
>
> We have already received one extension. This questionnaire was circulated
> on the NCSG list in January, and I do not believe the text that I see in
> the Google Doc today represents the view of the broader NCUC membership. I
> think it would be inappropriate for the EC to submit this, given the
> document has not been open to all members to edit, that the text is not
> final, and responses are not offered to a majority of the 19 questions
> being asked.
>
> A fortnight ago I requested, very modestly, that the membership have at
> least 24 hours to review the final text before the EC considers endorsing
> and submitting it. I am disappointed that this will not be the case. This
> is not how we used to work.
>
> I respectfully suggest that this response is under-developed and not
> suitable for submission on behalf of the NCUC. This is not a criticism of
> anyone (I thank those who have worked on this document), it is just the
> reality that we can't meet the deadline.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> ​Ayden Férdeline
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On April 5, 2018 1:14 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ​​
> >
> > Hi Ayden
> >
> > Yes, the deadline is 6th April.
> >
> > I'll send the document today to the EC.
> >
> > There are 13 pages on the document with many interventions.
> >
> > I will try to get an extra extension for this comment but seems unlikely.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Renata
> >
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> >
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> >
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>



-- 

Best regards.
Liz.

PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180405/b1fdfb63/attachment.html>