[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
Dan Krimm
dan at musicunbound.com
Sat Jul 29 00:07:39 CEST 2017
Sorry! My mistake. But the social purpose of the +1 expressions still
stands. (Same as in situations where we do have elections.)
Dan
On 7/28/17 3:01 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Appointments of representatives from NCUC to NCSG Executive Committee,
> Policy Committee, Finance Committee, Nomcom, PIR (and any other
> possible appointment) is made by the NCUC Executive Committee.
> the annual election is only to elect NCUC Executive Committee members
> and NCUC chair.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-07-29 6:54 GMT+09:00 dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com
> <mailto:dgdorothydg at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hmm! Dan's post seems to contradict Stephanie's. Kindly confirm
> process and remind us of the full membership of exec.
>
> best
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Dan Krimm <dan at musicunbound.com
> <mailto:dan at musicunbound.com>> wrote:
>
> The +1 expressions are not functional in an electoral sense.
> But they do fulfill a social/community function in terms of
> public collective response. They are part of our discussion
> as a group.
>
> There will be a formal election at some point, secret ballot
> using the usual ICANN tally system, and that will decide the
> choice.
>
> I am also happy to see two excellent candidates. It's better
> not to have unopposed candidates for election, if only for
> "structural" reasons.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 7/28/17 12:46 PM, dorothy g wrote:
>> Hi Can someone clarify the process for deciding between these
>> two excellent candidates? I am not sure if these +1 mails are
>> of any value.
>>
>> best regards
>> D
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> Generally I would say yes, but I think it is a good idea
>> for the candidates to answer the questions first, since I
>> a sure we are likely to get into a vigorous group
>> discussion and the purpose of this is to hear what the
>> candidates might have as answers...Can we wait for this
>> discussion?
>>
>> cheers Stephanie
>>
>>
>> On 2017-07-28 14:11, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>>> Hi Yolanda
>>>
>>> Yes you should give your views
>>> You can choose to share them only in the Africa list or
>>> broader
>>> Your regional rep can use of your group's advice
>>> But I believe so do we all so that is your option :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Em 28/07/2017 14:17, "Yolanda Mlonzi"
>>> <mamiyaomhle at gmail.com <mailto:mamiyaomhle at gmail.com>>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>> This is such a great question Ayden!
>>>
>>> Looking forward to hearing the responses...
>>>
>>> Silly question (newbie 😅) are we allowed to give
>>> our views on questions posed to candidates or should
>>> we wait to hear their responses?
>>>
>>> Yolanda.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ayden Férdeline
>>> <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am glad to hear that we have two nominations
>>> for this position. Like Renata, I also have a
>>> question for our candidates:
>>>
>>> * One of the jobs of the Nominating Committee,
>>> as best I understand it, is to ensure that
>>> the maximum number of qualified people are
>>> willing to offer themselves as nominees for
>>> a given role. If you uncover impediments
>>> which discourage people from being nominated
>>> who might otherwise be qualified and willing
>>> to volunteer their time, how would you go
>>> about eliminating or reducing those impediments?
>>>
>>> I ask this because this is not just a problem
>>> which you might face on the NomCom. We as NCUC
>>> members might face it soon too. In the coming
>>> months we are going to have elections for a
>>> number of important roles (as many as four seats
>>> on the GNSO Council, as well as leadership roles
>>> on both the NCSG EC and NCUC EC). Not having a
>>> complete slate of candidates could be
>>> problematic from the perspective of diversity
>>> and in terms of making sure we have enough
>>> people both with new views and the right amount
>>> of institutional knowledge. Have you any tips
>>> you can share with us on how to build large
>>> nominee pools?
>>>
>>> Thanks again for stepping forward.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
>>>> Local Time: July 28, 2017 3:04 PM
>>>> UTC Time: July 28, 2017 2:04 PM
>>>> From: raquino at gmail.com <mailto:raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> It is such good news we have 2 nominations for
>>>> Nomcom.
>>>> And both women from Africa.
>>>>
>>>> As NCUC LAC member, I'm happy to see Global
>>>> South representation.
>>>>
>>>> LAC is not represented in numbers well enough
>>>> in the ICANN community.
>>>> We do hope that changes.
>>>>
>>>> Will the chosen representative be appointed be
>>>> EC or vote?
>>>>
>>>> Whatever path taken, I believe who decides will
>>>> have a better chance of assessing if we hear
>>>> more from candidates.
>>>> I'd personally would like to know:
>>>>
>>>> - What are your thoughts and strategies for
>>>> advancement of diversity in ICANN, especially
>>>> Global South participation?
>>>>
>>>> - If Ines is chosen, do we have to choose a new
>>>> EC Africa?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170728/6125ac9b/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list