[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom

Sat Jul 29 02:26:18 CEST 2017

Hi,

I am sorry, I was traveling and didn't get to respond earlier. As Rafik
explained NomCom representative will be appointed by the NCUC executive
Committee. We will deliberate soon and come up with a decision. Ines, of
course, has recused herself from the decision making process since she is a
candidate.

Best

Farzaneh

Farzaneh

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Dan Krimm <dan at musicunbound.com> wrote:

> Sorry!  My mistake.  But the social purpose of the +1 expressions still
> stands.  (Same as in situations where we do have elections.)
>
> Dan
>
> On 7/28/17 3:01 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Appointments of representatives from NCUC to NCSG Executive Committee,
> Policy Committee, Finance Committee, Nomcom, PIR (and any other possible
> appointment) is made by the NCUC Executive Committee.
> the annual election is only to elect NCUC Executive Committee members and
> NCUC chair.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-07-29 6:54 GMT+09:00 dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hmm! Dan's post seems to contradict Stephanie's.  Kindly confirm process
>> and remind us of the full membership of exec.
>>
>> best
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Dan Krimm <dan at musicunbound.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The +1 expressions are not functional in an electoral sense.  But they
>>> do fulfill a social/community function in terms of public collective
>>> response.  They are part of our discussion as a group.
>>>
>>> There will be a formal election at some point, secret ballot using the
>>> usual ICANN tally system, and that will decide the choice.
>>>
>>> I am also happy to see two excellent candidates.  It's better not to
>>> have unopposed candidates for election, if only for "structural" reasons.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> On 7/28/17 12:46 PM, dorothy g wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Can someone clarify the process for deciding between these two
>>> excellent candidates? I am not sure if these +1 mails are of any value.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> D
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Generally I would say yes, but I think it is a good idea for the
>>>> candidates to answer the questions first, since I a sure we are likely to
>>>> get into a vigorous group  discussion and the purpose of this is to hear
>>>> what the candidates might have as answers...Can we wait for this discussion?
>>>>
>>>> cheers Stephanie
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-07-28 14:11, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Yolanda
>>>>
>>>> Yes you should give your views
>>>> You can choose to share them only in the Africa list or broader
>>>> Your regional rep can use of your group's advice
>>>> But I believe so do we all so that is your option :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em 28/07/2017 14:17, "Yolanda Mlonzi" <mamiyaomhle at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> This is such a great question Ayden!
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to hearing the responses...
>>>>>
>>>>> Silly question (newbie 😅) are we allowed to give our views on
>>>>> questions posed to candidates or should we wait to hear their responses?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yolanda.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am glad to hear that we have two nominations for this position.
>>>>>> Like Renata, I also have a question for our candidates:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - One of the jobs of the Nominating Committee, as best I
>>>>>>    understand it, is to ensure that the maximum number of qualified people are
>>>>>>    willing to offer themselves as nominees for a given role. If you uncover
>>>>>>    impediments which discourage people from being nominated who might
>>>>>>    otherwise be qualified and willing to volunteer their time, how would you
>>>>>>    go about eliminating or reducing those impediments?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I ask this because this is not just a problem which you might face on
>>>>>> the NomCom. We as NCUC members might face it soon too. In the coming months
>>>>>> we are going to have elections for a number of important roles (as many as
>>>>>> four seats on the GNSO Council, as well as leadership roles on both the
>>>>>> NCSG EC and NCUC EC). Not having a complete slate of candidates could be
>>>>>> problematic from the perspective of diversity and in terms of making sure
>>>>>> we have enough people both with new views and the right amount of
>>>>>> institutional knowledge. Have you any tips you can share with us on how to
>>>>>> build large nominee pools?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks again for stepping forward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>>>>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
>>>>>> Local Time: July 28, 2017 3:04 PM
>>>>>> UTC Time: July 28, 2017 2:04 PM
>>>>>> From: raquino at gmail.com
>>>>>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is such good news we have 2 nominations for Nomcom.
>>>>>> And both women from Africa.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As NCUC LAC member, I'm happy to see Global South representation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LAC is not represented in numbers well enough in the ICANN community.
>>>>>> We do hope that changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will the chosen representative be appointed be EC or vote?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever path taken, I believe who decides will have a better chance
>>>>>> of assessing if we hear more from candidates.
>>>>>> I'd personally would like to know:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - What are your thoughts and strategies for advancement of diversity
>>>>>> in ICANN, especially Global South participation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - If Ines is chosen, do we have to choose a new EC Africa?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttp://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttp://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170728/d5d6fbfd/attachment-0002.html>