[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
avri doria
avri at apc.org
Sat Jul 29 19:15:09 CEST 2017
Hi,
I suspect they take on even greater significance in helping the EC make
its decision. Though the addition of reasons for the +1 are probably a
good thing.
avri
On 28-Jul-17 18:07, Dan Krimm wrote:
>
> Sorry! My mistake. But the social purpose of the +1 expressions
> still stands. (Same as in situations where we do have elections.)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 7/28/17 3:01 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Appointments of representatives from NCUC to NCSG Executive
>> Committee, Policy Committee, Finance Committee, Nomcom, PIR (and any
>> other possible appointment) is made by the NCUC Executive Committee.
>> the annual election is only to elect NCUC Executive Committee members
>> and NCUC chair.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-07-29 6:54 GMT+09:00 dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com
>> <mailto:dgdorothydg at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Hmm! Dan's post seems to contradict Stephanie's. Kindly confirm
>> process and remind us of the full membership of exec.
>>
>> best
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Dan Krimm <dan at musicunbound.com
>> <mailto:dan at musicunbound.com>> wrote:
>>
>> The +1 expressions are not functional in an electoral sense.
>> But they do fulfill a social/community function in terms of
>> public collective response. They are part of our discussion
>> as a group.
>>
>> There will be a formal election at some point, secret ballot
>> using the usual ICANN tally system, and that will decide the
>> choice.
>>
>> I am also happy to see two excellent candidates. It's better
>> not to have unopposed candidates for election, if only for
>> "structural" reasons.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/17 12:46 PM, dorothy g wrote:
>>> Hi Can someone clarify the process for deciding between
>>> these two excellent candidates? I am not sure if these +1
>>> mails are of any value.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> D
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Generally I would say yes, but I think it is a good idea
>>> for the candidates to answer the questions first, since
>>> I a sure we are likely to get into a vigorous group
>>> discussion and the purpose of this is to hear what the
>>> candidates might have as answers...Can we wait for this
>>> discussion?
>>>
>>> cheers Stephanie
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-07-28 14:11, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>>>> Hi Yolanda
>>>>
>>>> Yes you should give your views
>>>> You can choose to share them only in the Africa list or
>>>> broader
>>>> Your regional rep can use of your group's advice
>>>> But I believe so do we all so that is your option :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em 28/07/2017 14:17, "Yolanda Mlonzi"
>>>> <mamiyaomhle at gmail.com <mailto:mamiyaomhle at gmail.com>>
>>>> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> This is such a great question Ayden!
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to hearing the responses...
>>>>
>>>> Silly question (newbie 😅) are we allowed to give
>>>> our views on questions posed to candidates or
>>>> should we wait to hear their responses?
>>>>
>>>> Yolanda.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ayden Férdeline
>>>> <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am glad to hear that we have two nominations
>>>> for this position. Like Renata, I also have a
>>>> question for our candidates:
>>>>
>>>> * One of the jobs of the Nominating
>>>> Committee, as best I understand it, is to
>>>> ensure that the maximum number of qualified
>>>> people are willing to offer themselves as
>>>> nominees for a given role. If you uncover
>>>> impediments which discourage people from
>>>> being nominated who might otherwise be
>>>> qualified and willing to volunteer their
>>>> time, how would you go about eliminating or
>>>> reducing those impediments?
>>>>
>>>> I ask this because this is not just a problem
>>>> which you might face on the NomCom. We as NCUC
>>>> members might face it soon too. In the coming
>>>> months we are going to have elections for a
>>>> number of important roles (as many as four
>>>> seats on the GNSO Council, as well as
>>>> leadership roles on both the NCSG EC and NCUC
>>>> EC). Not having a complete slate of candidates
>>>> could be problematic from the perspective of
>>>> diversity and in terms of making sure we have
>>>> enough people both with new views and the right
>>>> amount of institutional knowledge. Have you any
>>>> tips you can share with us on how to build
>>>> large nominee pools?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for stepping forward.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>
>>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline
>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
>>>>> Local Time: July 28, 2017 3:04 PM
>>>>> UTC Time: July 28, 2017 2:04 PM
>>>>> From: raquino at gmail.com <mailto:raquino at gmail.com>
>>>>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> It is such good news we have 2 nominations for
>>>>> Nomcom.
>>>>> And both women from Africa.
>>>>>
>>>>> As NCUC LAC member, I'm happy to see Global
>>>>> South representation.
>>>>>
>>>>> LAC is not represented in numbers well enough
>>>>> in the ICANN community.
>>>>> We do hope that changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will the chosen representative be appointed be
>>>>> EC or vote?
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever path taken, I believe who decides
>>>>> will have a better chance of assessing if we
>>>>> hear more from candidates.
>>>>> I'd personally would like to know:
>>>>>
>>>>> - What are your thoughts and strategies for
>>>>> advancement of diversity in ICANN, especially
>>>>> Global South participation?
>>>>>
>>>>> - If Ines is chosen, do we have to choose a
>>>>> new EC Africa?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list