[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom

avri doria avri at apc.org
Sat Jul 29 19:15:09 CEST 2017


Hi,

I suspect they take on even greater significance in helping the EC make
its decision.  Though the addition of reasons for the +1 are probably a
good thing.

avri



On 28-Jul-17 18:07, Dan Krimm wrote:
>
> Sorry!  My mistake.  But the social purpose of the +1 expressions
> still stands.  (Same as in situations where we do have elections.)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 7/28/17 3:01 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Appointments of representatives from NCUC to NCSG Executive
>> Committee, Policy Committee, Finance Committee, Nomcom, PIR (and any
>> other possible appointment) is made by the NCUC Executive Committee.
>> the annual election is only to elect NCUC Executive Committee members
>> and NCUC chair.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-07-29 6:54 GMT+09:00 dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com
>> <mailto:dgdorothydg at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>     Hmm! Dan's post seems to contradict Stephanie's.  Kindly confirm
>>     process and remind us of the full membership of exec.
>>
>>     best
>>
>>     On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Dan Krimm <dan at musicunbound.com
>>     <mailto:dan at musicunbound.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         The +1 expressions are not functional in an electoral sense. 
>>         But they do fulfill a social/community function in terms of
>>         public collective response.  They are part of our discussion
>>         as a group.
>>
>>         There will be a formal election at some point, secret ballot
>>         using the usual ICANN tally system, and that will decide the
>>         choice.
>>
>>         I am also happy to see two excellent candidates.  It's better
>>         not to have unopposed candidates for election, if only for
>>         "structural" reasons.
>>
>>         Dan
>>
>>
>>         On 7/28/17 12:46 PM, dorothy g wrote:
>>>         Hi Can someone clarify the process for deciding between
>>>         these two excellent candidates? I am not sure if these +1
>>>         mails are of any value.
>>>
>>>         best regards
>>>         D
>>>
>>>         On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>>>         <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>>         <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Generally I would say yes, but I think it is a good idea
>>>             for the candidates to answer the questions first, since
>>>             I a sure we are likely to get into a vigorous group 
>>>             discussion and the purpose of this is to hear what the
>>>             candidates might have as answers...Can we wait for this
>>>             discussion?
>>>
>>>             cheers Stephanie
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 2017-07-28 14:11, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
>>>>             Hi Yolanda
>>>>
>>>>             Yes you should give your views
>>>>             You can choose to share them only in the Africa list or
>>>>             broader
>>>>             Your regional rep can use of your group's advice
>>>>             But I believe so do we all so that is your option :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Em 28/07/2017 14:17, "Yolanda Mlonzi"
>>>>             <mamiyaomhle at gmail.com <mailto:mamiyaomhle at gmail.com>>
>>>>             escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>                 This is such a great question Ayden! 
>>>>
>>>>                 Looking forward to hearing the responses... 
>>>>
>>>>                 Silly question (newbie 😅) are we allowed to give
>>>>                 our views on questions posed to candidates or
>>>>                 should we wait to hear their responses?
>>>>
>>>>                 Yolanda. 
>>>>
>>>>                 On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ayden Férdeline
>>>>                 <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>
>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     Hi,
>>>>
>>>>                     I am glad to hear that we have two nominations
>>>>                     for this position. Like Renata, I also have a
>>>>                     question for our candidates:
>>>>
>>>>                       * One of the jobs of the Nominating
>>>>                         Committee, as best I understand it, is to
>>>>                         ensure that the maximum number of qualified
>>>>                         people are willing to offer themselves as
>>>>                         nominees for a given role. If you uncover
>>>>                         impediments which discourage people from
>>>>                         being nominated who might otherwise be
>>>>                         qualified and willing to volunteer their
>>>>                         time, how would you go about eliminating or
>>>>                         reducing those impediments?
>>>>
>>>>                     I ask this because this is not just a problem
>>>>                     which you might face on the NomCom. We as NCUC
>>>>                     members might face it soon too. In the coming
>>>>                     months we are going to have elections for a
>>>>                     number of important roles (as many as four
>>>>                     seats on the GNSO Council, as well as
>>>>                     leadership roles on both the NCSG EC and NCUC
>>>>                     EC). Not having a complete slate of candidates
>>>>                     could be problematic from the perspective of
>>>>                     diversity and in terms of making sure we have
>>>>                     enough people both with new views and the right
>>>>                     amount of institutional knowledge. Have you any
>>>>                     tips you can share with us on how to build
>>>>                     large nominee pools?
>>>>
>>>>                     Thanks again for stepping forward.
>>>>
>>>>                     Best wishes,
>>>>
>>>>                     Ayden Férdeline
>>>>                     linkedin.com/in/ferdeline
>>>>                     <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>                     -------- Original Message --------
>>>>>                     Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom
>>>>>                     Local Time: July 28, 2017 3:04 PM
>>>>>                     UTC Time: July 28, 2017 2:04 PM
>>>>>                     From: raquino at gmail.com <mailto:raquino at gmail.com>
>>>>>                     To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>                     <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>                     It is such good news we have 2 nominations for
>>>>>                     Nomcom.
>>>>>                     And both women from Africa. 
>>>>>
>>>>>                     As NCUC LAC member, I'm happy to see Global
>>>>>                     South representation. 
>>>>>
>>>>>                     LAC is not represented in numbers well enough
>>>>>                     in the ICANN community.
>>>>>                     We do hope that changes.
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Will the chosen representative be appointed be
>>>>>                     EC or vote?
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Whatever path taken, I believe who decides
>>>>>                     will have a better chance of assessing if we
>>>>>                     hear more from candidates.
>>>>>                     I'd personally would like to know:
>>>>>
>>>>>                     - What are your thoughts and strategies for
>>>>>                     advancement of diversity in ICANN, especially
>>>>>                     Global South participation?
>>>>>
>>>>>                     - If Ines is chosen, do we have to choose a
>>>>>                     new EC Africa? 
>>>>>
>>>>>                     Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                     _______________________________________________
>>>>                     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>                     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>                     <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>>                     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>                     <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>             Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>             Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>             <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>>             http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>             <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>             Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>             <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>             http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>             <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>         Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>         http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>         <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>         Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>         http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>         <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>     <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list