[NCUC-DISCUSS] A problem in registration form for ICANN60 Abu Dhabi

[Farell Folly]

Tapani suggestion (irrelevant, don't want to answer) seems a very good one
or we just use Mr/Mrs/Ms. The Icann meeting team can also check with local
host and seek for the best choice that  will avoid caveats



Regards
@__f_f__
https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
________________________________
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.

Le 17 juil. 2017 05:19, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> a
écrit :

> We might want to lobby to change the "Other" selection to
> "don't want to say" or "irrelevant" something to that effect
> and then all select that.
>
> Even better would be to get rid of the question altogether
> on grounds that it is irrelevant.
>
> Tapani
>
>
> On Jul 16 21:12, Renata Aquino Ribeiro (raquino at gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I have just read the raw transcript of the last WS2-Diversity meeting
> >
> > Meeting page
> >
> > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=66089058
> >
> > Raw transcript
> >
> > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66089058/
> DIVERSITY%20SUBGROUP%20MEETING%20_07132017-FINAL-en.pdf?version=1&
> modificationDate=1500220959000&api=v2
> >
> > The raw transcript means it is the 1st form of the transcript, no
> corrections
> >
> > But what I read made me caught my attention enough to share this on the
> lists
> >
> > Especially giving the discussion about reviewing where meetings happen
> >
> > Apparently there was a "concern" with registration to ICANN60 because
> > "a form" presented the follow question and options of response
> >
> > Gender:  Male/Female/Other
> >
> > The "other" option raised the "concern" and ombudsman brought up that
> > this was the theme of a conversation w/ local organization
> >
> > So what would happen if ICANN had, let's say, a number of
> > registrations of "Other" ?
> >
> > Would this be theme for other conversations between ombudsman and
> > local organizers?
> >
> > Are there any data collected by registration form that would cause
> > "concern" to local organizers?
> >
> > And sorry about the extensive use of quote marks. The words are a bit
> > surprising and I tried to soften the blow.
> >
> > Renata
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170717/26399b86/attachment-0002.html>