[NCUC-DISCUSS] Selection of ICANN meeting venues and dates

[James Gannon]

Personally I feel some neverending working group would be disastrous for this purpose.
We should set some lightweight guidelines and leave the professionals to manage it from there.

From: Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Olévié Kouami
Sent: 09 July 2017 21:08
To: romina florencia Cabrera <romicabrera83 at gmail.com>
Cc: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>; ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Selection of ICANN meeting venues and dates

Hi all
+1 @Renata.
I joint my to Renata's and Romina's ones.
It's better to set up a permanent working group for such situation.
Warm regards
Olévié

Le 9 juil. 2017 18:35, "romina florencia Cabrera" <romicabrera83 at gmail.com<mailto:romicabrera83 at gmail.com>> a écrit :
A greeting Renata, a correct comment, in the current changing world in which we live, with so many geopolitical and social crises, within the information society, and Internet phenomena, to maintain its security, stability and freedom (principles of Icann), resilience and adaptation to change is necessary. Greetings.

2017-07-09 14:48 GMT-03:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com<mailto:raquino at gmail.com>>:
Hi

I have a question.
I don't understand why this process of creating criteria for selection
of ICANN meeting cities has to be a one-time process.
Emergencies happen, there are governments becoming radicalized from
day to night, regional diplomatic crisis, restrictions to specific
countries, major economic conflicts...

So my question is:
Most working groups (or parties) are build to have a beginning and an end?

If ICANN's mission is about internet security, one would think that
the upkeep of its community is also important. And this relates
directly to this criteria improvement.

So a new process, a continuous one, which is always in place and ready
to listen to the community and implement changes seems to be what is
lacking here. I'm not sure if a ccwg can be continuous or has
amplitude enough for this.

Best,

Renata
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss


_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170709/1b4a72c1/attachment-0002.html>