[NCUC-DISCUSS] Selection of ICANN meeting venues and dates

[Olévié Kouami]

Thank you!

Le 9 juil. 2017 20:17, "romina florencia Cabrera" <romicabrera83 at gmail.com>
a écrit :

> thanks sorry
>
> 2017-07-09 17:16 GMT-03:00 romina florencia Cabrera <
> romicabrera83 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Thankd my dear friend :) Best regard a disponsal forever
>>
>> 2017-07-09 17:08 GMT-03:00 Olévié Kouami <olivierkouami at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>> +1 @Renata.
>>> I joint my to Renata's and Romina's ones.
>>> It's better to set up a permanent working group for such situation.
>>> Warm regards
>>> Olévié
>>>
>>> Le 9 juil. 2017 18:35, "romina florencia Cabrera" <
>>> romicabrera83 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> A greeting Renata, a correct comment, in the current changing world in
>>>> which we live, with so many geopolitical and social crises, within the
>>>> information society, and Internet phenomena, to maintain its security,
>>>> stability and freedom (principles of Icann), resilience and adaptation to
>>>> change is necessary. Greetings.
>>>>
>>>> 2017-07-09 14:48 GMT-03:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question.
>>>>> I don't understand why this process of creating criteria for selection
>>>>> of ICANN meeting cities has to be a one-time process.
>>>>> Emergencies happen, there are governments becoming radicalized from
>>>>> day to night, regional diplomatic crisis, restrictions to specific
>>>>> countries, major economic conflicts...
>>>>>
>>>>> So my question is:
>>>>> Most working groups (or parties) are build to have a beginning and an
>>>>> end?
>>>>>
>>>>> If ICANN's mission is about internet security, one would think that
>>>>> the upkeep of its community is also important. And this relates
>>>>> directly to this criteria improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> So a new process, a continuous one, which is always in place and ready
>>>>> to listen to the community and implement changes seems to be what is
>>>>> lacking here. I'm not sure if a ccwg can be continuous or has
>>>>> amplitude enough for this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Renata
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170709/e1eb62d4/attachment-0002.html>