[NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon

[Nadira Alaraj]

Thanks Rafik for your clarification,

However from what I'm observing here or at the  NCSG there are lengthy
discussions on different issues that end with no clear point of view when
there is a need to make a position or divert the discussion in more
productive ways. But on the case of the RightsCon proposal it was abvious
where the support are.

Nevertheless, I could see the spirit of volunteers here who come forward to
synthesis the discussions.  If it would be in an organize or moderating way
it might produce better results.

Again, this is just point of view and not calling for any action because
I'm not here enough to develop a good judgment.

Best wishes,
Nadira

On 1 Dec 2016 14:11, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nadira,
>
> It was kind of polling to get members preferences   and sense what they
> can support. in this case, option 3 get a more support. it is also not a
> real policy matter but more about getting some input and feedback.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2016 9:00 PM, "Nadira Alaraj" <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ayden for summarising this email thread.
> A decision to be made asap because the RightsCon deadline as you wrote is
> on Dec 5th.
>
> How the decisions are made on NCUC when there is no working committee on
> this issue to provide their recommendation to the group members?
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 13:09, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings all,
>> Just to summarise this thread; at the moment, we have five proposals:
>>
>> *1. Jurisdictional issues and domain name administration*
>> Supported by Avri Doria, Louise Marie Hurel
>>
>> *2. Adopting multistakeholder processes on the Internet: the case of
>> ICANN*
>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Aicha
>> Chebbi, Ines Hfaiedh, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>
>> *3. Content regulation and private ordering at Internet governance
>> institutions*
>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Stefania
>> Milan, Michael Oghia, Milton Mueller, Louise Marie Hurel, Ines Hfaiedh,
>> Huthaifa Albustanji, Kabir GZ, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>
>> *4. State and future of the Registration Directory Service*
>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Michael
>> Oghia
>>
>> *5. Volunteers in non-commercial groups*
>> Supported by Carlos Vera, Aicha Chebbi
>>
>> Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 are identifying a problem and mapping out the
>> challenges, whereas proposal 4 is more outcome orientated, looking to
>> create solutions to solve an issue.
>>
>> Thus far, proposal 3 has attracted more expressions of support on the
>> list than the other topics have (but this email thread was not a
>> referendum).
>>
>> The deadline for RightsCon proposals is this Monday.
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>> Local Time: 28 November 2016 12:38 PM
>> UTC Time: 28 November 2016 12:38
>> From: james at cyberinvasion.net
>> To: Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii <
>> farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>
>>
>> Most certainly not, we spent many months in the accountability group
>> making sure that we now have strong commitments in the ICANN bylaws against
>> this. And we will fight any attempt to circumvent that through other means.
>>
>> -J
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of
>> Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Monday 28 November 2016 at 12:32
>> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>>
>> While the conversation of ICANN in the process of implementing some of
>> her policies and agreement could become a content regulator is also very
>> interesting. There is high probability that some point almost become a
>> content regulator.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161201/c5e0b831/attachment-0002.html>