[NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon

[Michael Oghia]

Something else to consider is that individuals members of NCUC could also
collaborate as teams and submit a proposal for each of the other topics (or
whichever topic is most interesting to them). Ayden's email has already
grouped them by topic. Would anyone like to follow-up as a team on any of
them?

Best,
-Michael

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Rafik for your clarification,
>
> However from what I'm observing here or at the  NCSG there are lengthy
> discussions on different issues that end with no clear point of view when
> there is a need to make a position or divert the discussion in more
> productive ways. But on the case of the RightsCon proposal it was abvious
> where the support are.
>
> Nevertheless, I could see the spirit of volunteers here who come forward
> to synthesis the discussions.  If it would be in an organize or moderating
> way it might produce better results.
>
> Again, this is just point of view and not calling for any action because
> I'm not here enough to develop a good judgment.
>
> Best wishes,
> Nadira
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 14:11, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nadira,
>>
>> It was kind of polling to get members preferences   and sense what they
>> can support. in this case, option 3 get a more support. it is also not a
>> real policy matter but more about getting some input and feedback.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2016 9:00 PM, "Nadira Alaraj" <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Ayden for summarising this email thread.
>> A decision to be made asap because the RightsCon deadline as you wrote is
>> on Dec 5th.
>>
>> How the decisions are made on NCUC when there is no working committee on
>> this issue to provide their recommendation to the group members?
>>
>> On 1 Dec 2016 13:09, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings all,
>>> Just to summarise this thread; at the moment, we have five proposals:
>>>
>>> *1. Jurisdictional issues and domain name administration*
>>> Supported by Avri Doria, Louise Marie Hurel
>>>
>>> *2. Adopting multistakeholder processes on the Internet: the case of
>>> ICANN*
>>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Aicha
>>> Chebbi, Ines Hfaiedh, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>>
>>> *3. Content regulation and private ordering at Internet governance
>>> institutions*
>>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Stefania
>>> Milan, Michael Oghia, Milton Mueller, Louise Marie Hurel, Ines Hfaiedh,
>>> Huthaifa Albustanji, Kabir GZ, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>>
>>> *4. State and future of the Registration Directory Service*
>>> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Michael
>>> Oghia
>>>
>>> *5. Volunteers in non-commercial groups*
>>> Supported by Carlos Vera, Aicha Chebbi
>>>
>>> Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 are identifying a problem and mapping out the
>>> challenges, whereas proposal 4 is more outcome orientated, looking to
>>> create solutions to solve an issue.
>>>
>>> Thus far, proposal 3 has attracted more expressions of support on the
>>> list than the other topics have (but this email thread was not a
>>> referendum).
>>>
>>> The deadline for RightsCon proposals is this Monday.
>>>
>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>>> Local Time: 28 November 2016 12:38 PM
>>> UTC Time: 28 November 2016 12:38
>>> From: james at cyberinvasion.net
>>> To: Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii <
>>> farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Most certainly not, we spent many months in the accountability group
>>> making sure that we now have strong commitments in the ICANN bylaws against
>>> this. And we will fight any attempt to circumvent that through other means.
>>>
>>> -J
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of
>>> Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
>>> *Date: *Monday 28 November 2016 at 12:32
>>> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> *Cc: *NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>>>
>>> While the conversation of ICANN in the process of implementing some of
>>> her policies and agreement could become a content regulator is also very
>>> interesting. There is high probability that some point almost become a
>>> content regulator.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161201/513d6cec/attachment-0002.html>