[NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon

[William Drake]

Hi

In principle I’d support # 1 which seems rather relevant with Trump etc. but I’m not sure if this is the optimal setting for the discussion.  So # 3 seems like the best fit.

Best

Bill

> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:09, Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM> wrote:
> 
> Greetings all,
> 
> Just to summarise this thread; at the moment, we have five proposals:
> 
> 1. Jurisdictional issues and domain name administration
> Supported by Avri Doria, Louise Marie Hurel
> 
> 2. Adopting multistakeholder processes on the Internet: the case of ICANN
> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Aicha Chebbi, Ines Hfaiedh, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
> 
> 3. Content regulation and private ordering at Internet governance institutions
> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Stefania Milan, Michael Oghia, Milton Mueller, Louise Marie Hurel, Ines Hfaiedh, Huthaifa Albustanji, Kabir GZ, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
> 
> 4. State and future of the Registration Directory Service
> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Michael Oghia
> 
> 5. Volunteers in non-commercial groups
> Supported by Carlos Vera, Aicha Chebbi
> 
> Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 are identifying a problem and mapping out the challenges, whereas proposal 4 is more outcome orientated, looking to create solutions to solve an issue.
> 
> Thus far, proposal 3 has attracted more expressions of support on the list than the other topics have (but this email thread was not a referendum).
> 
> The deadline for RightsCon proposals is this Monday.
> 
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
> 
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>> Local Time: 28 November 2016 12:38 PM
>> UTC Time: 28 November 2016 12:38
>> From: james at cyberinvasion.net
>> To: Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> 
>> 
>> Most certainly not, we spent many months in the accountability group making sure that we now have strong commitments in the ICANN bylaws against this. And we will fight any attempt to circumvent that through other means.
>> 
>> -J
>> 
>> 
>> From: Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>> on behalf of Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com <mailto:benakin at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Monday 28 November 2016 at 12:32
>> To: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>
>> Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>> 
>> While the conversation of ICANN in the process of implementing some of her policies and agreement could become a content regulator is also very interesting. There is high probability that some point almost become a content regulator.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161201/9e980dfa/attachment-0002.html>