<p dir="ltr">Thanks Rafik for your clarification,</p>
<p dir="ltr">However from what I'm observing here or at the NCSG there are lengthy discussions on different issues that end with no clear point of view when there is a need to make a position or divert the discussion in more productive ways. But on the case of the RightsCon proposal it was abvious where the support are. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Nevertheless, I could see the spirit of volunteers here who come forward to synthesis the discussions. If it would be in an organize or moderating way it might produce better results. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Again, this is just point of view and not calling for any action because I'm not here enough to develop a good judgment.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Best wishes,<br>
Nadira <br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 1 Dec 2016 14:11, "Rafik Dammak" <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Hi Nadira,<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">It was kind of polling to get members preferences and sense what they can support. in this case, option 3 get a more support. it is also not a real policy matter but more about getting some input and feedback. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Rafik </div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 1, 2016 9:00 PM, "Nadira Alaraj" <<a href="mailto:nadira.araj@gmail.com" target="_blank">nadira.araj@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="m_-1287585297794784954quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Thanks Ayden for summarising this email thread. <br>
A decision to be made asap because the RightsCon deadline as you wrote is on Dec 5th.</p>
<p dir="ltr">How the decisions are made on NCUC when there is no working committee on this issue to provide their recommendation to the group members?</p>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="m_-1287585297794784954elided-text">On 1 Dec 2016 13:09, "Ayden Férdeline" <<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com" target="_blank">icann@ferdeline.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="m_-1287585297794784954elided-text"><p class="MsoNormal">Greetings all,<br></p><div>Just to summarise this thread; at the moment, we have five
proposals:<br></div><div><br><b>1. Jurisdictional issues and domain name administration</b><br>Supported by Avri Doria, Louise Marie Hurel</div><div><br><b>2. Adopting multistakeholder processes on the Internet: the
case of ICANN</b><br>Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana
Tropina, Aicha Chebbi, Ines Hfaiedh, Benjamin Akinmoyeje</div><div><br><b>3. Content regulation and private ordering at Internet
governance institutions</b><br>Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana
Tropina, Stefania Milan, Michael Oghia, Milton Mueller, Louise Marie Hurel,
Ines Hfaiedh, Huthaifa Albustanji, Kabir GZ, Benjamin Akinmoyeje</div><div><br><b>4. State and future of the Registration Directory Service</b><b><br></b>Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana
Tropina, Michael Oghia</div><div><br><b>5. Volunteers in non-commercial groups</b><b><br></b>Supported by Carlos Vera, Aicha Chebbi</div><div><br>Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 are identifying a problem and
mapping out the challenges, whereas proposal 4 is more outcome orientated,
looking to create solutions to solve an issue.</div><div><br>Thus far, proposal 3 has attracted more expressions of support on the list than
the other topics have (but this email thread was not a referendum).</div><div><br>The deadline for RightsCon proposals is this Monday.<br></div><div><br></div><div class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341protonmail_signature_block"><div class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341protonmail_signature_block-user"><div>Ayden Férdeline<br></div><div><a title="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline" target="_blank">linkedin.com/in/ferdeline</a><br></div></div><div class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341protonmail_signature_block-proton m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br></div></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341protonmail_quote"><div>-------- Original Message --------<br></div><div>Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon<br></div><div>Local Time: 28 November 2016 12:38 PM<br></div><div>UTC Time: 28 November 2016 12:38<br></div><div>From: <a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net" target="_blank">james@cyberinvasion.net</a><br></div><div>To: Benjamin Akinmoyeje <<a href="mailto:benakin@gmail.com" target="_blank">benakin@gmail.com</a>>, farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>><br></div><div>NCUC-discuss <<a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>><br></div><div><br></div><div> <br></div><div><div><div>Most certainly not, we spent many months in the accountability group making sure that we now have strong commitments in the ICANN bylaws against this. And we will fight any attempt to circumvent that through other means.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-J<br></div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div><div><br></div><span><div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:12pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt"><div><b>From: </b>Ncuc-discuss <<a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-discuss-bounces@lists.nc<wbr>uc.org</a>> on behalf of Benjamin Akinmoyeje <<a href="mailto:benakin@gmail.com" target="_blank">benakin@gmail.com</a>><br></div><div> <b>Date: </b>Monday 28 November 2016 at 12:32<br></div><div> <b>To: </b>farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>><br></div><div> <b>Cc: </b>NCUC-discuss <<a href="mailto:ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a>><br></div><div> <b>Subject: </b>Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><span class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341colour" style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341font" style="font-family:-webkit-standard"><span class="m_-1287585297794784954m_6127903688512404775m_-1986559580514895341size" style="font-size:medium">While
the conversation of ICANN in the process of implementing some of her policies and agreement could become a content regulator is also very interesting. There is high probability that some point almost become a content regulator.</span></span></span><br></div></span></blockquote><div><br></div><br></div><div class="m_-1287585297794784954quoted-text">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" target="_blank">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>