NCSG Policy Principles
Nicolas Adam
nickolas.adam at GMAIL.COM
Sun Dec 4 18:10:47 CET 2011
Indeed, a very good initiative. The implications in gnso policy-areas of
the principles we put forward should provide for very interesting
discussions.
And to Maria's point, I would believe that the "open, peer-to-peer"
nature of the Internet should be amongst the basic fundamental
principles that drive our community's involvement in gnso policy.
Nicolas
On 12/3/2011 8:07 AM, Maria Farrell wrote:
> Hi Joy,
>
> I think this is a terrific idea.
>
> ·Human rights: gTLD policy should meet human rights standards,
> including transparency and the rule of law.
>
> I would like to see this also mention privacy and freedom of
> expression. Perhaps, a reference to the specific human rights
> instruments we are invoking would be a way to achieve this?
>
> I would also like to see something expressing our philosophical
> support for the open, peer to peer nature of the Internet. Though
> maybe this isn't strictly within the purview of GNSO policy - I'm open
> to correction on that, though I think it's a good way to anchor our
> overall view.
>
> All the best, Maria
>
> On 1 December 2011 21:46, Joy Liddicoat <joy at apc.org
> <mailto:joy at apc.org>> wrote:
>
> Dear all - reflecting on my first few months as a GNSO councillor
> and the various NCUC and NCSG conversations it occurred, imho,
> that there seems to be a reasonably frequent resort to
> **fundamental** principles-type discussions from various voices in
> the policy discussions (domain name take downs, UDRP review, law
> enforcement, IPR to name a few) …. Meanwhile I was taking a fresh
> look at RFC 1591 and participating in a policy principles
> discussion on TLD policy in New Zealand that was kind of
> interesting and got me to thinking:
>
> as a new NCSG member, what do I know about the policy principles
> that guide the NCSG (not the principles in our various Charters,
> but policy principles that inform our SG policy inputs as a whole
> into ICANN related activities)? What are the perspectives on these
> and what do members think? Are there some core policy principles
> that we are agreed about? If so, how these could be drawn on to
> help guide our policy inputs in ICANN related matters
> (particularly as Councillors responsible for considering issues in
> light of diverse NCSG views)?
>
> I am may be mad for thinking about this (and I feel very gratified
> to be in a SG that will clearly tell me if this is so!) but I
> would like to initiate a dialogue about this in NCSG – even if it
> takes some time to work through. I am willing to take
> responsibility for facilitating this discussion and to, get the
> ball rolling, wonder if a list of policy principles for NCSG
> might, for example, look like this:
>
> ·NCSG prioritises the non-commercial, public interest aspects of
> domain name policy.
>
> ·Guardianship: gTLD policy should be focused on responsibilities
> and service to the community.
>
> ·Multi-stakeholder: gTLD policy should be determined by open
> multi-stakeholder processes.
>
> ·Human rights: gTLD policy should meet human rights standards,
> including transparency and the rule of law.
>
> ·Equity: parties to domain registrations (including non-commercial
> registrants) should be on a level playing field; domain
> registrations should be first come first served.
>
> ·Competition and choice: gTLD policy should ensure competition and
> choice for non-commercial registrants and non-commercial internet
> users.
>
> ·In case of conflict, the principle of guardianship prevails.
>
> If necessary, we can split discussion of each of these policy
> principles into separate discussions on the list, but perhaps we
> can start here ….
>
> Joy
>
> Joy Liddicoat
>
> Project Coordinator
>
> Internet Rights are Human Rights
>
> www.apc.org <http://www.apc.org>
>
> Tel: +64 21 263 2753 <tel:%2B64%2021%20263%202753>
>
> Skype id: joy.liddicoat
>
> Yahoo id: strategic at xtra.co.nz <mailto:strategic at xtra.co.nz>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20111204/9c537fd4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list