<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Indeed, a very good initiative. The implications in gnso
    policy-areas of the principles we put forward should provide for
    very interesting discussions.<br>
    <br>
    And to Maria's point, I would believe that the "open, peer-to-peer"
    nature of the Internet should be amongst the basic fundamental
    principles that drive our community's involvement in gnso policy. <br>
    <br>
    Nicolas<br>
    <br>
    On 12/3/2011 8:07 AM, Maria Farrell wrote:
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAC7qwdAAi9fiUtzfHsApT5hZtZ5u92cjjA-EpbRvym7jTjQGyg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">Hi Joy,
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I think this is a terrific idea.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>
        <p style="margin-left: 36pt; "><span style="font-size: 11pt;
            font-family: Symbol; "><span>·<span style="font: normal
                normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; ">         </span></span></span><span
            style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Human
            rights: gTLD policy should meet human rights standards,
            including transparency and the rule of law.</span></p>
        <div><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
            sans-serif; ">I would like to see this also mention privacy
            and freedom of expression. Perhaps, a reference to the
            specific human rights instruments we are invoking would be a
            way to achieve this?</span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
            sans-serif; "><br>
          </span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
            sans-serif; ">I would also like to see something expressing
            our philosophical support for the open, peer to peer nature
            of the Internet. Though maybe this isn't strictly within the
            purview of GNSO policy - I'm open to correction on that,
            though I think it's a good way to anchor our overall view.</span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
            sans-serif; "><br>
          </span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
            sans-serif; ">All the best, Maria</span></div>
        <div><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            On 1 December 2011 21:46, Joy Liddicoat <span dir="ltr"><<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:joy@apc.org">joy@apc.org</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
              <div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-NZ">
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">Dear all - reflecting on my first
                    few months as a GNSO councillor and the various NCUC
                    and NCSG conversations it occurred, imho, that there
                    seems to be a reasonably frequent resort to *<b>fundamental</b>*
                    principles-type discussions from various voices in
                    the policy discussions (domain name take downs, UDRP
                    review, law enforcement, IPR to name a few) ….
                    Meanwhile I was taking a fresh look at RFC 1591 and
                    participating in a policy principles discussion on
                    TLD policy in New Zealand that was kind of
                    interesting and got me to thinking: </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">as a new NCSG member, what do I
                    know about the policy principles that guide the NCSG
                    (not the principles in our various Charters, but
                    policy principles that inform our SG policy inputs
                    as a whole into ICANN related activities)? What are
                    the perspectives on these and what do members think?
                    Are there some core policy principles that we are
                    agreed about? If so, how these could be drawn on to
                    help guide our policy inputs in ICANN related
                    matters (particularly as Councillors responsible for
                    considering issues in light of diverse NCSG views)?</p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">I am may be mad for thinking
                    about this (and I feel very gratified to be in a SG
                    that will clearly tell me if this is so!) but I
                    would like to initiate a dialogue about this in NCSG
                    – even if it takes some time to work through. I am
                    willing to take responsibility for facilitating this
                    discussion and to, get the ball rolling, wonder if a
                    list of policy principles for NCSG might, for
                    example, look like this: </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">NCSG
                      prioritises the non-commercial, public interest
                      aspects of domain name policy.</span></p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Guardianship:
                      gTLD policy should be focused on responsibilities
                      and service to the community.</span></p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Multi-stakeholder:
                      gTLD policy should be determined by open
                      multi-stakeholder processes.</span></p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Human
                      rights: gTLD policy should meet human rights
                      standards, including transparency and the rule of
                      law.</span></p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Equity:
                      parties to domain registrations (including
                      non-commercial registrants) should be on a level
                      playing field; domain registrations should be
                      first come first served.</span></p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Competition
                      and choice: gTLD policy should ensure competition
                      and choice for non-commercial registrants and
                      non-commercial internet users. </span></p>
                  <p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span
                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span>·<span
                          style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">        
                        </span></span></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">In
                      case of conflict, the principle of guardianship
                      prevails.</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">If necessary, we can split
                    discussion of each of these policy principles into
                    separate discussions on the list, but perhaps we can
                    start here ….</p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">Joy</p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">
                    <span>Joy Liddicoat</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Project Coordinator</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Internet Rights are Human
                      Rights</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">www.apc.org</a></span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Tel: <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="tel:%2B64%2021%20263%202753"
                        value="+64212632753" target="_blank">+64 21 263
                        2753</a></span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Skype id: joy.liddicoat</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Yahoo id: <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:strategic@xtra.co.nz"
                        target="_blank">strategic@xtra.co.nz</a></span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>