[ncdnhc-discuss] Montevideo and MArina del REy resolutions

[Erick Iriarte]

Hi!

The problem not is Vany, the problem is us. Because we don't participate in 
the discuss, and we don't have clear some things, how much people is 
necessary to aproved a resolution? one, two, all?

i don't know, but two or three people don't make the correct answer to all.
You can say, that some people don't say anything, but the democracy is the 
possibility of the silence.

But the silence of a lot of us is the problem.

Vany is right is necessary more participation, but if nobody participate, 
all the resolutions will be maked by two or three.

See you.

Erick

At 11:13 a.m. 1/14/2002 -0500, KathrynKL at aol.com wrote:
>Vany wrote:
><<Just for clarify, what the whole membership will do in February (after
>an AdCom decision of such an schedule
>which I was against since I was pushing since December to vote on
>resolutions before NC had to make
>any decision regarding .ORG) is to VOTE on resolutions regardless the
>results (aprooval or disaprooval).>>
>
>It is my understanding that materials, including the Names Council .ORG 
>proposals, have been changing.  It might have been hard to vote in 
>December.   But we have certainly been discussing the .ORG and other 
>issues since before the November meeting and continued this consultation, 
>with updates and drafts, after the November meeting.  To me, this makes 
>the consultation process very important and worthwhile.
>
>But I share a question with Vany:  what are the resolutions on the table 
>right now.  What was adopted in November?  Which ones will be voted on at 
>the March ICANN meeting?  Which ones will be used by our NCC Names Council 
>members to share our views and concerns with the Names Council and ICANN 
>Board?
>
>regards, kathy ACM-IGP
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20020114/45f779be/attachment-0001.html>