[Oprtf] OPRTF Call | Attendance & Zoom Recordings | Thursday, 15 May 2025

Sun Jun 15 02:59:39 CEST 2025

 Dear all,

After proposing the postponement to next Thursday, I realized I will be
mid-flight, going to the IGF, during the proposed time. *Could we change
the meeting to Friday, June 20th, 15:00 UTC? If not, either Namra needs to
be available to lead the meeting, or we would have to have a larger meeting
the week following the IGF to finish all the work. I'm asking you, until
midnight of June 16th (UTC/GMT), to answer with your preference among those
two alternatives - which means (a) moving to June 20th, 15 UTC or (b)
maintaining on June 19th, 15 UTC if Namra is available, and, if not, doing
a larger meeting after the IGF, on July 3rd, 15UTC).*

Here is the link so we can start working on the next sections (Sections III
to VIII):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XfKcFS1meIQczWc_hRKBllEpU7Ty2fHvZhUkQOjfHnw/edit?usp=sharing

Commenting on a few points, especially about the final decision on
Sections I to II *(PLEASE READ):*

Thanks for your patience in waiting for the next steps after I was able to
check in with Namra - the numerous Internet Governance processes that are
culminating this month are consuming a lot of time, and the way things
happened made it hard to think about how to proceed here. *I once again ask
this Task Force not to* *leave new suggestions to the last minute or during
the call, since this makes our work deeply inefficient.* We can't leave the
meetings with more questions than we started, or noticing things that we'd
like to change when we should already be building a first level of
consensus. At each controversial point, we need to get to two or more
proposals, so we can vote on them afterwards.

*As mentioned before, suggestions that were brought up only during the call
were not accounted for and will not be inserted in the proposal of the
review. *

As far as I understood, besides smaller suggestions already listed on the
doc (and I have presumed consensus for those that were apparently not part
of the call and had no comment on them on the doc), these here are
decisions on controversial issues:

   - NCUC PC
      - Consensus: Reevaluate forming NCUC PC; no editing until conceptual
      agreement. *I understand, then, that there was consensus for not
      changing any of the text there.*
      - Decision: Remove all Trello references—Confluence is now standard.
   - Appointments and positions
      - Avoid overlapping roles when travel is involved. *I understand that
      there was consensus here.*
      - In the notes, there is an objection to mandatory criteria, but no
      consensus seems to have emerged. I maintain my personal position, as this
      is the only way to block people who do not actually do work within the
      NCSG. *I would like to ask for a vote on the list between those two
      options: (i) we should have mandatory engagement criteria, allowing for
      explicit justification and some flexibility [I'd go with
Karzan's wording];
      (ii) no mandatory engagement criteria.*
      - Two similar discussions about the relevance of the appointments
      were raised:
         - EC meetings should always be held for at least for more
         important roles, such as NomCom. No indication of a consensus
or concrete
         suggestion in the notes.
         - Interviews should happen to fill critical roles. No indication
         of a consensus here.
         - *Would like, then, to ask for a vote on what are those critical
         roles (a) NomCom and PIR; (b) NomCom, PIR and NCSG EC *
      - Emergency roles should be temporary; full process must
      follow. Shortened timelines allowed—but must be transparent and
justified. *I
      understand that there is consensus here, but no text was suggested.*

Please check if I missed something.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.

Em ter., 10 de jun. de 2025 às 13:18, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Sorry for not following up on this yet, I still need to catch up with
> Namra to decide on next steps.
>
> But I'm sending this message to let everyone know that the meeting that
> would potentially happen this week is moved to next week, due to ICANN83.
> I'll send the next working doc later today.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
> Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC
> Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
> engano, favor responder informando o erro.
>
> Em qui., 29 de mai. de 2025, 18:55, Andrea Glandon <
> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find below the attendance and recordings from the Operating
>> Procedures Review Task Force meeting held on Thursday, 29 May 2025 at 15:00
>> UTC.
>>
>>
>>
>> This information is also available on the wiki here.
>> [icann-community.atlassian.net]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AQDqE__;!!PtGJab4!_BNFy05-elTUc5Q2yZiITU7ZJTrsf2ATyR5jZuDYYOLs5fQRt_ZLSpUijJPQuhvyUO8iFqtvxExp1tNxT_ch8JSXINxS3hY3OQo$>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Attendees: *Ken Herman, Mohammad Atif Aleem, Raymond Mamattah, Hakikur
>> Rahman, Lily Edinam Botsyoe, Namra Naseer, Oksana Prykhodko, Pascal BEK. |*
>> Apologies: *Pedro de Perdigão Lana, Gabriel Karsan, Houda Chihi |* ICANN
>> org:* Andrea Glandon
>>
>>
>>
>> Zoom Replay
>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/fWyaeGwT9UZQkQl0pe4uFnHpeB2lB2aDFWKk14QEjZ8nI_azMI3_MfhbKa86tOXSbYrOmdTpkNmb7Pbw.GAoBENDTApiIahoD>
>>
>> Audio Replay
>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/b9_zkqr4sqIHtxZAxCfqBDt0GJ4e7qTMpvqyb4JoAk79QoaFbC3xz-BptYxGJXNT1OlmvTBI1uYSN_kx.il_Yirmz8Y9pt91x>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> *Andrea Glandon*
>>
>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oprtf mailing list
>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/oprtf/attachments/20250614/9e345c2f/attachment.htm>