[NCUC-EC] Issues forum

[Mili Semlani]

Thanks for laying out my thoughts so well Ken. I had the same feeling and I
think given the lack of prep time too, why not just go ahead with Bruna and
Julf's proposed session and make the issue forum at ICANN79 about it?

Second your suggestion.
--
With gratitude
*Mili Semlani*
Community specialist
Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>



On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 15:44, Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com> wrote:

> Benjamin, I am reflecting on our discussion yesterday regarding the issues
> forum and I am a little confused over why we are not accepting Julf and
> Bruna’s proposal. What I got from our EC meeting was that we have some
> ideas to pursue for the slot, and since there is only 75 minutes, we could
> not accommodate two topics due to time constraints.
>
>
>
> My thoughts are that since there is already a topic with substantial
> interest, and with speakers already arranged, why not just have the one
> topic and we plan for other topics for us to develop for future meetings?
>
>
>
> Grateful if you can help me understand your perspective, and perhaps the
> other EC members can share their thoughts.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Ken
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20240109/6a94de9b/attachment.htm>