[NCUC-EC] Issues forum

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi everyone,

We had some further conversations and realized we could proceed without
divergences, both proposals were actually well-aligned and we did not
realize that immediately because of a few misunderstandings through the
email exchange.

The Global Partners proposal was an initial idea that we should collaborate
and build upon to add our concerns, speakers and other contributions. I
believe it is up to us now to add our own ideas to deepen those that were
brought to us, giving a twist related to human rights and the work NCUC is
doing and has done in ICANN related to this theme.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
<https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em ter., 9 de jan. de 2024 às 11:46, Mili Semlani <milisemlani at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Thanks for laying out my thoughts so well Ken. I had the same feeling and
> I think given the lack of prep time too, why not just go ahead with Bruna
> and Julf's proposed session and make the issue forum at ICANN79 about it?
>
> Second your suggestion.
> --
> With gratitude
> *Mili Semlani*
> Community specialist
> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 15:44, Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com> wrote:
>
>> Benjamin, I am reflecting on our discussion yesterday regarding the
>> issues forum and I am a little confused over why we are not accepting Julf
>> and Bruna’s proposal. What I got from our EC meeting was that we have some
>> ideas to pursue for the slot, and since there is only 75 minutes, we could
>> not accommodate two topics due to time constraints.
>>
>>
>>
>> My thoughts are that since there is already a topic with substantial
>> interest, and with speakers already arranged, why not just have the one
>> topic and we plan for other topics for us to develop for future meetings?
>>
>>
>>
>> Grateful if you can help me understand your perspective, and perhaps the
>> other EC members can share their thoughts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ken
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20240109/d67e96f2/attachment-0001.htm>