[NCUC-EC] [NCSG-PC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 Sessions

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Manju,

I am fine with the suggestion, I think that will help to prepare and
follow-up for council sessions, by splitting in two dedicated sessions.
I will reach out to GAC too then. I was thinking if we resume having joint
meetings with ALAC. SSAC can be another candidate for the meeting.  I
cannot promise we cannot get all or we can find the time to do so but
worthy to reach out either for Seattle or for next meetings.

Best,

Rafik

Le mer. 11 déc. 2024 à 16:24, 陳曼茹 Manju Chen <manju at nii.org.tw> a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> How about adding one 60-min PC session on Saturday (15:00) and cut the
> Tuesday one to 60-min?
>
> We can use the first one to discuss/prepare for all of our bilaterals; for
> the Tuesday one, councilors can bring back insights from the council
> working sessions and we'll be in a better position to discuss the agenda
> items of the Council meeting.
>
> Should we try to arrange a session with the GAC too? If not possible,
> maybe can do one online before Seattle.
>
> Best,
> Manju
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 1:06 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> I think we can move the policy session instead to Sunday or Saturday as
>> we can prepare for council meetings and/or joint council meetings. Let's
>> hear from other members.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le mer. 11 déc. 2024 à 10:32, Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Yes, Board Operations will ask for topics/questions for the Board before
>>> the meeting. I could move the NCSG Membership session to Saturday at 15:00.
>>> We don’t know who will be part of the SCCI yet, so that would be a conflict
>>> for them. Or I could move it to Sunday at 15:00.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 19:09
>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>
>>> *Cc: *"Exec. Comm" <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>, "npoc-ec at icann.org" <
>>> npoc-ec at icann.org>, NCSG EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>, ncsg-pc <
>>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-PC] ICANN82 Sessions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>>
>>> I missed that Board-NCSG session at 9:00. For another session for PC, I
>>> will leave it to Tomslin and PC if they support that. It also means we have
>>> to prepare the meeting with Board prior to ICANN82.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024, 10:01 Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am happy to  move any of the sessions you would like, if we can find a
>>> slot that doesn’t conflict with something else.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you don’t want any session booked against GNSO Working Sessions I can
>>> try to move them. For the NCUC Issue Forum they want 90 min which are hard
>>> to come by.
>>>
>>> As far as NCSG PC, we cannot have a session at 9am on that day as that
>>> is when NCSG is meeting with the Board. Do you want another session for
>>> NCSG PC? You want more than 90 min?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I also have a tab that tells me which members are part of IRTs and WGs
>>> so I am trying not to conflict with those as well. Please take a look at
>>> the schedule and let me know where you see slots that you prefer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 17:48
>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>
>>> *Cc: *"Exec. Comm" <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>, "npoc-ec at icann.org" <
>>> npoc-ec at icann.org>, "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>, "
>>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [NCSG-PC] ICANN82 Sessions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the draft schedule.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For Saturday, I am wondering if it is ok to have an NCPH session on the
>>> first day, I assume it is fine but we won't have to prepare internally.
>>>
>>> For Sunday, it seems odd to have NCUC and NPOC against GNSO council
>>> working sessions.
>>>
>>> For Tuesday, it looks ok but I am wondering if we can have an additional
>>> session for NCSG PC at 9:00 meaning 2 sessions with coffee break in the
>>> middle.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will reach out to CSG leadership to see if we can have a joint meeting
>>> in Seattle, if there is no objection.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mer. 11 déc. 2024 à 01:56, Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello all!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find attached a PDF of the sessions that I have scheduled for
>>> ICANN82. If you have any concerns with the time slots chosen, please
>>> respond to me directly. At this time I only have access to the GNSO
>>> schedule, I do not know how the other SO/AC schedules look.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> *Andrea Glandon*
>>>
>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>>>
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>
>>> *Skype ID:*  acglandon76
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc [lists.ncsg.is]
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc__;!!PtGJab4!5VI_w4I8aQAqhxVbqF8v4Gp-NZMp7XWaW2lo9ZIMj2tYDaaNvT8KAMO7ZZOLTh0AOsfJURvTBOLmmENW_Xd9U9uutAW2rdU$>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20241211/285a721b/attachment.htm>