[NCUC-EC] Draft FY21 ABR doc for Org - REVIEW BY 17 DEC

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Dear all,

We got no comments on the ABR document from the membership.

Given that we had Christmas and that we're still in the "in between" week,
I will send a reminder tonight and give an additional 24hr for the
membership to provide comments.

I would also ask you to do a final review as well.

*I plan to submit to Org by tomorrow 29 December evening (UTC -5)*

Have a nice day,

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:18 AM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <
rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks all for your comments. The time I put there was indeed too short.
> It was meant as a placeholder of sorts, and I'm glad you did flag it. I've
> replaced it with 3-4 hours and added our suggestions to break it into two
> as need be. 3 hours can be one sitting, but I think 4 should definitely be
> 2-2.
>
> And thanks Ken for the language edits :)
>
> I will proceed with sharing this with Bruna and Raoul, and I'll put it on
> the general list early next week as planned.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:53 PM Mili Semlani <milisemlani at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I support the idea of breaking up the session in 2 parts.
>>
>> --
>> With gratitude
>> Mili Semlani
>> Journalist & Engagement Manager
>> Founder @ Youth4IG <http://youth4ig.asia>
>> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 03:09, Olga Kyryliuk <olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raphael and All,
>>>
>>> I totally agree with comment made by Ken in previous email. And I left a
>>> similar remark in the google doc. Maybe you can take that into
>>> consideration before sharing with Org. I believe we can always reduce the
>>> timing but it is better to have some more space since beginning, which
>>> would give us a bit more flexibility when working on the agenda.
>>>
>>> Thanks for putting it all together.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Olga
>>>
>>>
>>> *17 декабря 2020, 16:10:20, от "Ken Herman" <ken at kherman.com
>>> <ken at kherman.com>>:*
>>>
>>> Hi Raphael.
>>>
>>> I’ve made a few editing suggestions but otherwise looks good to me.
>>>
>>> My only general comment is that it’s a lot of material to include, and
>>> absorb, in a 90 - 120 minute session, especially on a virtual presentation,
>>> when attention-spans can dwindle. I do not have a lot of experience with
>>> these trainings so I admit it’s hard for me to judge, and I defer to others
>>> with more experience. Someone can maybe help me understand how prescriptive
>>> we need to be with Org, do we tell them everything or do we simply let them
>>> know what we want to do and let the education specialists there design the
>>> best approach?
>>>
>>> If left to us, my only suggestion is to consider breaking the training
>>> into two sessions, which would have the benefit of allowing time for the
>>> class cohort to both digest the material as well as interact between the
>>> sessions. An exercise can be added to the first session which could
>>> reinforce the material.
>>>
>>> I realize there may be challenges to get participants into even one
>>> class, much less two, but I would wonder that if participants are not
>>> engaged enough to finish the training then how motivated would they be to
>>> participate at all.
>>>
>>> Ken
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> *On Behalf Of *Raphael
>>> Beauregard-Lacroix
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2020 12:31 PM
>>> *To:* Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> *Subject:* [NCUC-EC] Draft FY21 ABR doc for Org - REVIEW BY 17 DEC
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> As promised, please find below.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m_hdfKoebb-4qmRy6zopbIpBpdemSw7sSp1audhK354/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> *I would kindly ask you to review this document ASAP and by no later
>>> than Thursday 17 Dec 23:59 UTC, *so that it can be circulated with NCSG
>>> and NPOC leadership for coordination.
>>>
>>> thank you, and have a nice day,
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing listNCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20201228/388094a5/attachment.html>