[NCUC-EC] Draft FY21 ABR doc for Org - REVIEW BY 17 DEC

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Thanks all for your comments. The time I put there was indeed too short. It
was meant as a placeholder of sorts, and I'm glad you did flag it. I've
replaced it with 3-4 hours and added our suggestions to break it into two
as need be. 3 hours can be one sitting, but I think 4 should definitely be
2-2.

And thanks Ken for the language edits :)

I will proceed with sharing this with Bruna and Raoul, and I'll put it on
the general list early next week as planned.

Have a nice day,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:53 PM Mili Semlani <milisemlani at gmail.com> wrote:

> I support the idea of breaking up the session in 2 parts.
>
> --
> With gratitude
> Mili Semlani
> Journalist & Engagement Manager
> Founder @ Youth4IG <http://youth4ig.asia>
> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/theuntraveller/> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/milisemlani/>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 03:09, Olga Kyryliuk <olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Raphael and All,
>>
>> I totally agree with comment made by Ken in previous email. And I left a
>> similar remark in the google doc. Maybe you can take that into
>> consideration before sharing with Org. I believe we can always reduce the
>> timing but it is better to have some more space since beginning, which
>> would give us a bit more flexibility when working on the agenda.
>>
>> Thanks for putting it all together.
>>
>> Best,
>> Olga
>>
>>
>> *17 декабря 2020, 16:10:20, от "Ken Herman" <ken at kherman.com
>> <ken at kherman.com>>:*
>>
>> Hi Raphael.
>>
>> I’ve made a few editing suggestions but otherwise looks good to me.
>>
>> My only general comment is that it’s a lot of material to include, and
>> absorb, in a 90 - 120 minute session, especially on a virtual presentation,
>> when attention-spans can dwindle. I do not have a lot of experience with
>> these trainings so I admit it’s hard for me to judge, and I defer to others
>> with more experience. Someone can maybe help me understand how prescriptive
>> we need to be with Org, do we tell them everything or do we simply let them
>> know what we want to do and let the education specialists there design the
>> best approach?
>>
>> If left to us, my only suggestion is to consider breaking the training
>> into two sessions, which would have the benefit of allowing time for the
>> class cohort to both digest the material as well as interact between the
>> sessions. An exercise can be added to the first session which could
>> reinforce the material.
>>
>> I realize there may be challenges to get participants into even one
>> class, much less two, but I would wonder that if participants are not
>> engaged enough to finish the training then how motivated would they be to
>> participate at all.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> *On Behalf Of *Raphael
>> Beauregard-Lacroix
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2020 12:31 PM
>> *To:* Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>> *Subject:* [NCUC-EC] Draft FY21 ABR doc for Org - REVIEW BY 17 DEC
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As promised, please find below.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m_hdfKoebb-4qmRy6zopbIpBpdemSw7sSp1audhK354/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> *I would kindly ask you to review this document ASAP and by no later than
>> Thursday 17 Dec 23:59 UTC, *so that it can be circulated with NCSG and
>> NPOC leadership for coordination.
>>
>> thank you, and have a nice day,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing listNCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20201218/6c8e749a/attachment-0001.html>