[NCUC-EC] CIVICRM Costs/Request

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Tapani,

yes, that is technically possible, creating views or restricting access at
least at DB level. I have no idea how would work at civircrm layer  but I
can assume it can handle that.

Best,

Rafik

Le mar. 17 juil. 2018 à 16:56, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
a écrit :

> Hi Rafik,
>
> I actually agree with everything you say, I just want to highlight
> one point:
>
> On Jul 17 16:41, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > This discussion raises a lot of questions about trusting and empowering
> the
> > representatives appointed to different committees. They cannot be
> appointed
> > and tasked with something and then be bypassed by NCUC EC interventions.
> > NCUC EC can and should review applications coming to NCUC after the
> > approval to become NCSG member as indicated in NCUC bylaws. That would
> be a
> > different process and a different matter.
>
> Different process, yes, but same database could (and IMHO should)
> be used - after all one idea behind it was getting rid of separate
> constituency member databases.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180717/754418e3/attachment.html>