[NCUC-EC] reminder: CROP proposals in evaluation

Mon Feb 26 14:46:58 CET 2018

Btw, I approve all three CROP requests but I would like for the LAC and
Africa ones to have more consistent outreach plans.

2018-02-26 10:45 GMT-03:00 Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:

> Renata, one short clarification: Having read all the proposals now I
> wanted to make clear that* I did not object to any of them.*
> I just think we could suggest adaptations to both of them - thats why I
> had questions with regards to time in the LAC one and outreach in both. If
> we asked Ayden to better describe outreach plans in his CROP proposal why
> shouldnt we ask Roxanne and Liz ?  I find it necessary to clear up my
> considerations because (a) I dont think I am going beyond my EC role when I
> write them and (b) these members will most likely get their CROP requests
> approved and will get to represent NCUC in a forum so we should raise the
> bar and make some requirements when it comes to the Constituency
> representation.
>
> One question though: were the Africa and LAC proposals approved to the
> respective programmes ? You wrote on your email that the LACNIC one was in
> provisional acceptance, what about the Africa one?
>
> I would also like all of those who took the time to send the email to the
> list supporting both proposals taking the time to suggest outreach ideas.
>
> Best,
> B.
>
> 2018-02-26 10:18 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I vote to approve the CROP LAC LACNIC29 + LACNOG and the CROP AF -
>> Africa Internet Summit. Both look good, and I'm pleased that there's been
>> such strong collaboration among the community in developing these proposals.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Answers inline.
>>> Short answer: all proposals were sent both to general list and EC list.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
>>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My comments are under each CROP
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CROP AF - Africa Internet Summit
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008807.html
>>>> Sent date 7Feb
>>>> NCUC Session proposal: to be sent until 2March, sent to NCUC-Discuss
>>>> and NCUC-EC
>>>> CROP Proposer: Liz Orembo
>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
>>>>
>>>> Vote: The applicant doesnt quite describe her outreach plans in her
>>>> application: *" *This time I plan to work with the regional engagement
>>>> teams on ICANN sessions, main focus this time will be on NCUC and its role
>>>> at ICANN. I'm also planning on sending a presentation proposal. Until
>>>> 2 March this can be done. I'll try to build this presentation with NCUC
>>>> members*" - *this feels a little empty. Also her presentation proposal
>>>> is not listed on the email, was it approved ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [RAR] I believe when proposer sent this application the details for AIS
>>> proposal weren't posted yet. Now they have and she did, sent to regional
>>> list, main list and EC and received no objections. However, lots of
>>> collaboration in the document
>>> Proposal document
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-c6tsMtWCxBDHtbFL9OsGy6U
>>> uz1rzpx2qpgARR4SQbg/edit
>>> Discussion on regional list Feb 14
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-af/2018-February/000256.html
>>> Proposal on main list Feb 19
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-February/043731.html
>>> Proposal on EC list Feb 20
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008897.html
>>>
>>>
>>> CROP LAC - LACNIC29 + LACNOG
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008806.html
>>>> Sent date 7Feb
>>>> NCUC Session proposals: 2
>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: provisional acceptance
>>>> CROP Proposer: Roxanne John
>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
>>>>
>>>> Vote*: Yes with conditions! *Presentation proposal looks consistent
>>>> and is very good, apart from that 5 min for 3 speakers looks too little
>>>> time. On a side note, I would like the applicant to be more active on the
>>>> general presentation and less of a presenter or moderator (the proposal
>>>> doesnt quite state who will be doing what). I also see no outreach plan
>>>> such as (a) draft members, (b) participate on discussions on behalf of ncuc
>>>> or any other possibility, the idea of developing outreach with GSE and not
>>>> the constituency also seems a little off - Given that the member is from
>>>> the LAC region, I would love if she could send her proposal to the list
>>>> asking for input.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [RAR] Proposals were also sent to list and received comments. I am
>>> co-author of proposals.
>>> Note that these proposals are only flash talk readouts of reports of
>>> work NCUC did at IGF2017 and will do at WSIS.
>>> Proposer will indicate, through her readout, what were the issues
>>> discussed by NCUC at these venues and who did that discussion.
>>> Also there is an idea of remote presentation by key policy people in
>>> NCUC via a short video.
>>> If the proposal is approved the arrangements for this will be made.
>>> Proposal document (IGF2017 is the concrete one right now as we are
>>> waiting for WSIS results)
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iHn-npOfO4Q6WmBP3a5QU3A-
>>> rDoGiSaAlh2d5Vcgufo/edit
>>> Proposal sent to list
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-February/043619.html
>>> Proposal sent to EC list
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/008806.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> CROP NA - Rightscon
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-December/008643.html
>>>> Sent date 17 Dec
>>>> NCUC Session proposal: 1
>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: Accepted
>>>> CROP Proposer: Michael Karanicolas
>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
>>>>
>>>> Vote: *Yes! *This is the most developed CROP proposal of them all but
>>>> one point for consideration would be to include other NCUC member in
>>>> attendance both in the Panel composition and in the management of the booth
>>>> - but for this we probably to have wait for the RightsCon funding requests
>>>> to come back.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> best,
>>>> b
>>>> --
>>>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>>>>
>>>> +55 61 99252-6512 <(61)%2099252-6512>
>>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> @boomartins
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>
> +55 61 99252-6512 <+55%2061%2099252-6512>
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

+55 61 99252-6512
Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180226/523ff943/attachment.html>