[NCUC-EC] Travel funding allocation - ICANN63

Michael Karanicolas mkaranicolas at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 03:25:56 CEST 2018


I'm fine with that. Thanks for taking the initiative. I would suggest
sending it out first thing tomorrow, barring any further feedback, given
the urgency of the matter.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:16 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I changed the draft-email a little bit, lmk what you think!
>
> "Hello Thomas and Ben,
>
> According to the recent email regarding the travel funding allocation, we
> would ask you guys to hold off for a day in taking any financial
> commitments towards this next meeting.
>
> This was a tough call for the NCUC EC to decide given the quality of the
> applicants. And as we were concluding the deliberation there was a
> confusion about the final voting tallies  - reason why there was an
> interpretation that we were allocating the funding to Ben and the CROP to
> Thomas. But given that it would be super unfair with the rest of our
> members to  announce a CROP allocation without an open call previously
> announced, we might have to review the decision of the allocation.
>
> On behalf of the NCUC EC I apologize for the confusion and promise that
> this problem will be sorted out soon.
>
> best,"
>
> Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 20:51, Michael Karanicolas <
> mkaranicolas at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> I think that the funding allocation announcement was drafted against our
>> bylaws, and needs to be replaced with a proper process.
>>
>> I suggest we give the EC until COB tomorrow to vote for their preferred
>> second candidate, at which point silence will be deemed an abstention. On
>> Friday am, we can announce the candidate based on the vote tallies at that
>> point. We can then go out with a revised announcement. In the meantime, I
>> would suggest that we send out a "holding" email to Dina and Ben,
>> explaining the situation.
>>
>> I'm fine with the statement you made on the other list, though I'd
>> potentially substitute the part calling it a tie, to revise as follows:
>>
>> Hello Thomas and Ben,
>>
>> According to the recent email regarding the travel funding allocation, we
>> would ask you both to hold off for a day in taking any financial
>> commitments towards this next meeting.
>>
>> This was a tough call for the NCUC EC to decide given the quality of the
>> applicants and as we were concluding the deliberation there was a confusion
>> about the final voting tallies and the deliberation being supposedly
>> concluded when it wasnt.  Also, based on the fact that we must announce a
>> call before a CROP allocation, we might have to review the decision of the
>> allocation. Due to these mistakes, we will have to retract the funding
>> allocation announcement and you will be notified soon.
>>
>> On behalf of the NCUC EC I apologize for the confusion and promise that
>> we will do whatever possible to sort it out.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:27 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos <
>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> We should deliberate on whether or not we are retracting the funding
>>> allocation announcement. Also, we must draft a statement to membership
>>> explaining the matter.
>>>
>>> Lmk what do you think about this.
>>>
>>> best,
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>>>
>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>> @boomartins
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180829/0c1aec62/attachment.html>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list