[NCUC-EC] [deadline 6th April - Please vote] NCUC response on fellowship questionnaire

Thu Apr 5 19:15:04 CEST 2018

Ines, I will make sure to take a look tonight too! (:

2018-04-05 14:06 GMT-03:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:

> Thanks all. Please feel free to edit as well so that we are able to
> finalize it by tonight.
>
>
> Le jeudi 5 avril 2018, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> a écrit :
> > Hello
> >
> > Thanks all once more.
> > Indeed the deadline is Apr 6 and it is up to the EC to decide on
> > submitting it or not.
> > If it can be done by tomorrow then we'll share that with members.
> >
> > As mentioned, this is already an extension of the original comment
> > period so unless ICANN organization gives NCUC an extension, it won't
> > be considered after the deadline.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Renata,
> >>
> >> The document indeed isn't presentable as is. However, I think it would
> be
> >> worthwhile if Ines would work on the document, as she suggested, in
> order to
> >> fine tune it as much as possible.
> >>
> >> I'd vote that we check the updates on the document tomorrow earliest or
> >> tonight and swiftly evaluate amongst each other if the document would be
> >> good enough to circulate amongst the members list and submit later on
> April
> >> 6th. If we find that the document still needs work, then I guess we
> could
> >> revert to the NCSG document which seems to be somehow finalized.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Elsa
> >> --
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
> raquino at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> Thank you all for your comments
> >>> As we have 3 votes already this is where it seems that this matter is:
> >>>
> >>> Deadline for NCUC submission is 6 April - since doc is deemed not
> >>> ready (by majority of EC isn't) - won't be submitted
> >>> If an extension to NCUC is granted, the submission can be re-evaluated
> >>> Contributions made to NCUC comment are being tentatively incorporated
> >>> to NCSG comment, which will be submitted
> >>>
> >>> I will share this decision of the EC with members tomorrow unless I
> >>> receive any other data which could possibly change this process.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Renata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Michael Karanicolas
> >>> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > I generally concur - though it looks now as if Claudio has migrated
> over
> >>> > to
> >>> > Farzi's draft, so I'm not sure where that leaves us in terms of the
> >>> > drafting... Nonetheless, I think it would be good to have an NCUC
> >>> > submission
> >>> > as well, and would warmly encourage Ines, and anyone else, to keep
> >>> > working
> >>> > on this so we can have something to put in.
> >>> >
> >>> > As to the complaints about process - I think it's a legitimate point
> >>> > about
> >>> > leaving things too close to the deadline - and that going forward we
> >>> > should
> >>> > aim to get a coherent draft finalized at least 48 hours prior to the
> >>> > deadline for commentary on the lists. However, it's also worth noting
> >>> > that
> >>> > the NCSG draft was shared later than the NCUC version - so if people
> are
> >>> > ok
> >>> > with the process around that, I think it nullifies the procedural
> >>> > objections
> >>> > to our submitting an NCUC comment as well.
> >>> >
> >>> > Best,
> >>> >
> >>> > Michael
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I follow Ines's suggestion, we should at least try to improve the
> >>> >> proposed
> >>> >> comments as of this evening - the document is not ideal -  and
> >>> >> circulating
> >>> >> it tomorrow morning on the broader NCUC list before submitting it.
> >>> >> Despite
> >>> >> the fact that the NCSG's comment is indeed really good, I think the
> >>> >> program
> >>> >> could benefit from having one more input.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Best,
> >>> >> B
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2018-04-05 11:47 GMT-03:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I highly recommend and endorse sending the comment before the
> deadline
> >>> >>> but NOT the way it looks now. It needs some refinement.
> >>> >>> I will work on it tonight as I am still teaching. I believe it s
> very
> >>> >>> important we share our community opinion on the fellowship program.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Le jeudi 5 avril 2018, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> a
> >>> >>> écrit
> >>> >>> :
> >>> >>> > Dear EC
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > We have a very important input to be given by NCUC on the ICANN
> >>> >>> > Fellowship
> >>> >>> > Program
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Claudio Lucena has been building up this document with members
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dzd70OBSr1dqE5-_
> FUFtt1M13CXpDlAkaycUWEIEZW4/edit
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > More information about this consultation, including extensive
> >>> >>> > material
> >>> >>> > on
> >>> >>> > the program is to be found here
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/fellowship-
> >>> >>> > community-process-review-2018-03-20-en
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > The initial deadline for this was 30th March
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > We have got a few days extension and we need to submit it by
> >>> >>> > tomorrow.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > It will still be proofread before submission but I think we have
> >>> >>> > enough contributions, building up to 13 pages
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > As you have seen on the list, Ayden wants the document back to
> >>> >>> > NCUC-Discuss but I find unlikely we get a few more days
> extension to
> >>> >>> > do that.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > So please vote on sending this response or not
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > If not, we will just not participate on this consultation by
> ICANN
> >>> >>> > organization
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Thanks
> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> >>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> >>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>> >>
> >>> >> +55 61 99252-6512
> >>> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>> >> @boomartins
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >>
> >> Elsa Saade
> >> Consultant
> >> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> >> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

+55 61 99252-6512
Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180405/a3b16b47/attachment.html>