[NCUC-EC] [NC 6th April - Please vote] NCUC response on fellowship questionnaire

[Elsa S]

Hi Renata,

The document indeed isn't presentable as is. However, I think it would be
worthwhile if Ines would work on the document, as she suggested, in order
to fine tune it as much as possible.

I'd vote that we check the updates on the document tomorrow earliest or
tonight and swiftly evaluate amongst each other if the document would be
good enough to circulate amongst the members list and submit later on April
6th. If we find that the document still needs work, then I guess we could
revert to the NCSG document which seems to be somehow finalized.

Best,

Elsa
--

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello
>
> Thank you all for your comments
> As we have 3 votes already this is where it seems that this matter is:
>
> Deadline for NCUC submission is 6 April - since doc is deemed not
> ready (by majority of EC isn't) - won't be submitted
> If an extension to NCUC is granted, the submission can be re-evaluated
> Contributions made to NCUC comment are being tentatively incorporated
> to NCSG comment, which will be submitted
>
> I will share this decision of the EC with members tomorrow unless I
> receive any other data which could possibly change this process.
>
> Best,
>
> Renata
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Michael Karanicolas
> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I generally concur - though it looks now as if Claudio has migrated over
> to
> > Farzi's draft, so I'm not sure where that leaves us in terms of the
> > drafting... Nonetheless, I think it would be good to have an NCUC
> submission
> > as well, and would warmly encourage Ines, and anyone else, to keep
> working
> > on this so we can have something to put in.
> >
> > As to the complaints about process - I think it's a legitimate point
> about
> > leaving things too close to the deadline - and that going forward we
> should
> > aim to get a coherent draft finalized at least 48 hours prior to the
> > deadline for commentary on the lists. However, it's also worth noting
> that
> > the NCSG draft was shared later than the NCUC version - so if people are
> ok
> > with the process around that, I think it nullifies the procedural
> objections
> > to our submitting an NCUC comment as well.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I follow Ines's suggestion, we should at least try to improve the
> proposed
> >> comments as of this evening - the document is not ideal -  and
> circulating
> >> it tomorrow morning on the broader NCUC list before submitting it.
> Despite
> >> the fact that the NCSG's comment is indeed really good, I think the
> program
> >> could benefit from having one more input.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> B
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2018-04-05 11:47 GMT-03:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> I highly recommend and endorse sending the comment before the deadline
> >>> but NOT the way it looks now. It needs some refinement.
> >>> I will work on it tonight as I am still teaching. I believe it s very
> >>> important we share our community opinion on the fellowship program.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Le jeudi 5 avril 2018, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> a
> écrit
> >>> :
> >>> > Dear EC
> >>> >
> >>> > We have a very important input to be given by NCUC on the ICANN
> >>> > Fellowship
> >>> > Program
> >>> >
> >>> > Claudio Lucena has been building up this document with members
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dzd70OBSr1dqE5-_
> FUFtt1M13CXpDlAkaycUWEIEZW4/edit
> >>> >
> >>> > More information about this consultation, including extensive
> material
> >>> > on
> >>> > the program is to be found here
> >>> >
> >>> > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/fellowship-
> >>> > community-process-review-2018-03-20-en
> >>> >
> >>> > The initial deadline for this was 30th March
> >>> >
> >>> > We have got a few days extension and we need to submit it by
> tomorrow.
> >>> >
> >>> > It will still be proofread before submission but I think we have
> >>> > enough contributions, building up to 13 pages
> >>> >
> >>> > As you have seen on the list, Ayden wants the document back to
> >>> > NCUC-Discuss but I find unlikely we get a few more days extension to
> >>> > do that.
> >>> >
> >>> > So please vote on sending this response or not
> >>> >
> >>> > If not, we will just not participate on this consultation by ICANN
> >>> > organization
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>
> >> +55 61 99252-6512
> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >> @boomartins
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>



-- 
--

Elsa Saade
Consultant
Gulf Centre for Human Rights
Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180405/e5ee1588/attachment.html>