[NCUC-EC] Formulation and Invitation to join the Task Force on NCUC Procedural Rules

[Anna Loup]

Thank you for drafting this! As I am still moving today, I will take a look
and will respond before Tuesday at 8am UTC.

Best,
Anna

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:36 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
>
>
> Good that it is not only open to members of the task force.
>
> But yes, i have a different view on this process but I again commend
>
> the effort of those doing it and the EC view is quite clear so we move
>
> along.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Renata
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:55 AM, farzaneh badii
>
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It is a meeting with all the ncuc members who want to attend the
> meeting. It
>
> > is not closed to ncuc members who are not the member of the task force.
>
> >
>
> > On 16 Jan 2017 10:53, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Hi
>
> >>
>
> >> Yes, I understood the meetings would be for NCUC members only. Also I
>
> >> had understood it would be for NCUC members who would be wanting to
>
> >> participate on the taskforce only, but doesn't really make a
>
> >> difference as it just adds another degree of closedness (sorry I can't
>
> >> find other word).
>
> >> And yes, it was just a suggestion as I had suggested before not to
>
> >> have any closed meetings, I'll also agree to disagree on this.
>
> >>
>
> >> Best,
>
> >>
>
> >> Renata
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:46 AM, farzaneh badii
>
> >> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Renata
>
> >> >
>
> >> > what do you mean by we will hold closed meetings? We will hold
> meetings
>
> >> > open
>
> >> > to all ncuc members.  Naturally we won't allow people from other
>
> >> > consituencies and stakeholder groups who are not ncuc members to
> express
>
> >> > their opinion on what procedural rules ncuc should function on.
>
> >> >
>
> >> > Since I don't believe the meeting held with ncuc members is closed I
>
> >> > wouldn't add your suggestion.
>
> >> >
>
> >> > Best
>
> >> >
>
> >> > Farzaneh
>
> >> >
>
> >> > On 16 Jan 2017 10:36, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >
>
> >> > Hi
>
> >> >
>
> >> > On 3 I'd add
>
> >> >
>
> >> > "We will hold closed meetings..."
>
> >> >
>
> >> > I've also taken a look at my workload and won't be joining the TF but
>
> >> > will participate as EC responsibility.
>
> >> >
>
> >> > Best,
>
> >> >
>
> >> > Renata
>
> >> >
>
> >> >
>
> >> >
>
> >> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:04 PM, farzaneh badii
>
> >> > <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> I drafted the below to send to the NCUC members about procedural
> rules
>
> >> >> task
>
> >> >> force. Let me know if it's ok and if you agree with the process.I'd
>
> >> >> like
>
> >> >> to
>
> >> >> announce on list no later than Tuesday. We can either follow the
>
> >> >> process I
>
> >> >> am recommending below or leave it to the task force to come up with a
>
> >> >> process of how to come up with the procedural rule!
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> Dear NCUC Members,
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> This is to  announce the formulation of the task force on NCUC
>
> >> >> procedural
>
> >> >> rules. You are invited to join this task force. It will commence its
>
> >> >> work
>
> >> >> next week.The leader of the task force is Anna Loup.
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> Some background and the process:
>
> >> >> The executive committee is in charge of issuing procedural rules for
>
> >> >> various
>
> >> >> functions of NCUC. We have decided to convene this task force which
>
> >> >> includes
>
> >> >> the EC and interested members as well in order to draft the
> procedural
>
> >> >> rules. The process of drafting and approval of the procedural rules
> is
>
> >> >> as
>
> >> >> follows:
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> 1. The task force drafts the procedural rules
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> 2. The procedural rules will be sent to the members for comments and
>
> >> >> changes.
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> 3. These comments and changes will be resolved by the task force and
>
> >> >> the
>
> >> >> EC.
>
> >> >> We will hold meetings with the members to resolve the issues, and
> will
>
> >> >> lead
>
> >> >> discussions on the mailing list.
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> 4. After the resolution of the comments, the document will then be
> sent
>
> >> >> for
>
> >> >> final comments to the members,
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> 5.  After the final comments are resolved, the EC will deliberate on
>
> >> >> its
>
> >> >> approval.
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> The task force is open to all of the NCUC members. You can either be
> an
>
> >> >> active member or an observer. You can join the task force at any time
>
> >> >> but
>
> >> >> we
>
> >> >> will start our work by next week.
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> The following document identifies those areas that need procedural
>
> >> >> rules .
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Pg0PruKjtNNgnTZmrZ8UpaflzFiaUHRWIEbjrvCH5A/edit?usp=sharing
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> If you think there are other issues that should be addressed please
>
> >> >> feel
>
> >> >> free to insert your comments.
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> Best
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> Farzaneh
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>
> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>
> >> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NCUC-EC mailing list
>
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170116/395c0d33/attachment.html>