[NCUC-EC] Formulation and Invitation to join the Task Force on NCUC Procedural Rules

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi

Good that it is not only open to members of the task force.
But yes, i have a different view on this process but I again commend
the effort of those doing it and the EC view is quite clear so we move
along.

Best,

Renata


On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:55 AM, farzaneh badii
<farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a meeting with all the ncuc members who want to attend the meeting. It
> is not closed to ncuc members who are not the member of the task force.
>
> On 16 Jan 2017 10:53, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Yes, I understood the meetings would be for NCUC members only. Also I
>> had understood it would be for NCUC members who would be wanting to
>> participate on the taskforce only, but doesn't really make a
>> difference as it just adds another degree of closedness (sorry I can't
>> find other word).
>> And yes, it was just a suggestion as I had suggested before not to
>> have any closed meetings, I'll also agree to disagree on this.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Renata
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:46 AM, farzaneh badii
>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Renata
>> >
>> > what do you mean by we will hold closed meetings? We will hold meetings
>> > open
>> > to all ncuc members.  Naturally we won't allow people from other
>> > consituencies and stakeholder groups who are not ncuc members to express
>> > their opinion on what procedural rules ncuc should function on.
>> >
>> > Since I don't believe the meeting held with ncuc members is closed I
>> > wouldn't add your suggestion.
>> >
>> > Best
>> >
>> > Farzaneh
>> >
>> > On 16 Jan 2017 10:36, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On 3 I'd add
>> >
>> > "We will hold closed meetings..."
>> >
>> > I've also taken a look at my workload and won't be joining the TF but
>> > will participate as EC responsibility.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Renata
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:04 PM, farzaneh badii
>> > <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I drafted the below to send to the NCUC members about procedural rules
>> >> task
>> >> force. Let me know if it's ok and if you agree with the process.I'd
>> >> like
>> >> to
>> >> announce on list no later than Tuesday. We can either follow the
>> >> process I
>> >> am recommending below or leave it to the task force to come up with a
>> >> process of how to come up with the procedural rule!
>> >>
>> >> Dear NCUC Members,
>> >>
>> >> This is to  announce the formulation of the task force on NCUC
>> >> procedural
>> >> rules. You are invited to join this task force. It will commence its
>> >> work
>> >> next week.The leader of the task force is Anna Loup.
>> >>
>> >> Some background and the process:
>> >> The executive committee is in charge of issuing procedural rules for
>> >> various
>> >> functions of NCUC. We have decided to convene this task force which
>> >> includes
>> >> the EC and interested members as well in order to draft the procedural
>> >> rules. The process of drafting and approval of the procedural rules is
>> >> as
>> >> follows:
>> >>
>> >> 1. The task force drafts the procedural rules
>> >>
>> >> 2. The procedural rules will be sent to the members for comments and
>> >> changes.
>> >>
>> >> 3. These comments and changes will be resolved by the task force and
>> >> the
>> >> EC.
>> >> We will hold meetings with the members to resolve the issues, and will
>> >> lead
>> >> discussions on the mailing list.
>> >>
>> >> 4. After the resolution of the comments, the document will then be sent
>> >> for
>> >> final comments to the members,
>> >>
>> >> 5.  After the final comments are resolved, the EC will deliberate on
>> >> its
>> >> approval.
>> >>
>> >> The task force is open to all of the NCUC members. You can either be an
>> >> active member or an observer. You can join the task force at any time
>> >> but
>> >> we
>> >> will start our work by next week.
>> >>
>> >> The following document identifies those areas that need procedural
>> >> rules .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Pg0PruKjtNNgnTZmrZ8UpaflzFiaUHRWIEbjrvCH5A/edit?usp=sharing
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you think there are other issues that should be addressed please
>> >> feel
>> >> free to insert your comments.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Farzaneh
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>
>> >
>> >