[NCUC-EC] Selection of candidates for Policy Committee representatives

Thu Dec 7 17:07:21 CET 2017

Thanks all for a great call.  I have made up my mind for the two Policy
Committee members and I  select Nick and Farell.
 I also agree that many other members, whether selected or not, can get
involved in Policy making processes.

2017-12-04 13:43 GMT+01:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:

> Thanks all. It seems that I won't be able to attend the call as I am stuck
> in two conferences. I have made up my mind for the two Policy Committee
> members and I would select Nick and Farell.
>  I also agree that many other members, whether selected or not, can get
> involved in Policy making processes.
>
> Best of luck
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Garanti
> sans virus. www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_3092557473065225122_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> 2017-12-01 19:45 GMT+01:00 Louise Marie Hurel <louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com>
> :
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> It took me a while to post because, as Elsa, I am still quite unsure of
>> who to vote for.
>>
>>  "The PC NCUC is a tough job to take, and it's important that we trust
>> the candidates we choose 150% in my opinion" -- couldn't agree more, Elsa
>>
>> Nick is knowledgeable and experienced in ICANN's policy processes, and
>> his insights and background will be helpful as part of the policy
>> committee. Don't see that Nick coming from GAC as a negative point a
>> priori. He's been "in the house" for a couple of months now and actively
>> participating in many calls with substantive comments/contributions. Might
>> be a good name for the PC. So one vote would go to him.
>>
>> I am also a bit unsure about Kris or Farell. Kris has an extensive
>> curriculum and knowledge for taking up the task of being part of the PC.
>> Farell, as Bruna noted, has been quite active in translating, outreach,
>> and engaged in the DNS abuse report. However, I sense that many of his
>> concerns are directed to the operational/organizational challenges to
>> the policy processes -- which is a valid one, but I'd like to see him
>> comment more on his actual engagement and commitment with the policy
>> processes per se.
>>
>> It is unfortunate that Dina did not elaborate more on her responses, she
>> seems like a good candidate and committed to contributing to voicing
>> non-commercial interests -- given her background. However, while I would be
>> willing to take the shot and give her my vote, I still think she might
>> excel as a volunteer as she builds up the "lack of experience" she
>> mentioned. An important note that has not come up yet: She's the only woman
>> that has applied for this position and perhaps we should keep
>> gender-balance-sensitive so that we don't end up structuring all-male
>> committees.
>>
>> One vote missing, still.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Louise Marie Hurel
>>
>> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>>
>> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications (Data and
>> Society)
>> Skype: louise.dias
>> +44 (0) 7468 906327 <+44%207468%20906327>
>> *l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk <l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk> *
>> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-27 17:56 GMT+00:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>> Kris Seeburn seems to have the longest CV and the most experience
>>> generally, especially related to issues that the policy committee is
>>> likely going to have to tackle, like GDPR-privacy.
>>>
>>> In terms of Nick... the other three seem relatively close in terms of
>>> experience and credentials, and  he seems to me as if he's going to be
>>> the
>>> best writer, and we need someone with drafting ability to take over
>>> after Ayden departs. I guess I'm straying a bit from the evaluation
>>> criteria, but I think that's important. Those are just my thoughts.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Thank you Michael for your vote.
>>> >
>>> > Please see this recommendation:
>>> >
>>> > As per our procedures:
>>> > Each NCUC EC member will provide justification as to why one candidate
>>> > is more qualified than other applicants - p. 9
>>> >
>>> > While we're at it, for the all EC - a note on evaluation criteria - p.
>>> 8
>>> >
>>> > NCSG Policy Committee:
>>> >
>>> > a. Has documented experience in ICANN policy-making processes, as well
>>> > as a demonstrated understanding of ICANN’s structure and mission, and
>>> > of the Policy Committee’s role and tasks.
>>> >
>>> > b. Has contributed previously to the formulation of comments or
>>> > statements on behalf of the NCUC or the NCSG, and participated within
>>> > the past 12 months on either the NCUC or NCSG mailing lists.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Renata
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Michael Karanicolas
>>> > <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I vote for Kris Seeburn and Nick Shorey.
>>> >>
>>> >> Michael
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>> >> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Hi
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please find attached the candidates for NCUC representatives at
>>> Policy
>>> >>> Committee NCSG
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We received these applications
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Kris Seeburn
>>> >>> Farell Folly
>>> >>> Dina Solveig
>>> >>> Nick Shorey
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We need to appoint 2 representatives
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Candidates qualifications and review process can be found in item II
>>> of our
>>> >>> Operating Procedures
>>> >>>
>>> >>> https://www.ncuc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NCUC-Operati
>>> ng-Procedures-Sept-2017.pdf
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Renata
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>> >>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20171207/6454b440/attachment.html>