[NCUC-EC] Selection of candidates for Policy Committee representatives

[hfaiedh ines]

Thanks all. It seems that I won't be able to attend the call as I am stuck
in two conferences. I have made up my mind for the two Policy Committee
members and I would select Nick and Farell.
 I also agree that many other members, whether selected or not, can get
involved in Policy making processes.

Best of luck

<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Garanti
sans virus. www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

2017-12-01 19:45 GMT+01:00 Louise Marie Hurel <louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com>:

> Dear all,
>
> It took me a while to post because, as Elsa, I am still quite unsure of
> who to vote for.
>
>  "The PC NCUC is a tough job to take, and it's important that we trust the
> candidates we choose 150% in my opinion" -- couldn't agree more, Elsa
>
> Nick is knowledgeable and experienced in ICANN's policy processes, and his
> insights and background will be helpful as part of the policy committee.
> Don't see that Nick coming from GAC as a negative point a priori. He's been
> "in the house" for a couple of months now and actively participating in
> many calls with substantive comments/contributions. Might be a good name
> for the PC. So one vote would go to him.
>
> I am also a bit unsure about Kris or Farell. Kris has an extensive
> curriculum and knowledge for taking up the task of being part of the PC.
> Farell, as Bruna noted, has been quite active in translating, outreach,
> and engaged in the DNS abuse report. However, I sense that many of his
> concerns are directed to the operational/organizational challenges to the
> policy processes -- which is a valid one, but I'd like to see him comment
> more on his actual engagement and commitment with the policy processes per
> se.
>
> It is unfortunate that Dina did not elaborate more on her responses, she
> seems like a good candidate and committed to contributing to voicing
> non-commercial interests -- given her background. However, while I would be
> willing to take the shot and give her my vote, I still think she might
> excel as a volunteer as she builds up the "lack of experience" she
> mentioned. An important note that has not come up yet: She's the only woman
> that has applied for this position and perhaps we should keep
> gender-balance-sensitive so that we don't end up structuring all-male
> committees.
>
> One vote missing, still.
>
> Best,
>
> Louise Marie Hurel
>
> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>
> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications (Data and
> Society)
> Skype: louise.dias
> +44 (0) 7468 906327
> *l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk <l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk> *
> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>
>
> 2017-11-27 17:56 GMT+00:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>
>> Sure.
>>
>> Kris Seeburn seems to have the longest CV and the most experience
>> generally, especially related to issues that the policy committee is
>> likely going to have to tackle, like GDPR-privacy.
>>
>> In terms of Nick... the other three seem relatively close in terms of
>> experience and credentials, and  he seems to me as if he's going to be the
>> best writer, and we need someone with drafting ability to take over
>> after Ayden departs. I guess I'm straying a bit from the evaluation
>> criteria, but I think that's important. Those are just my thoughts.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thank you Michael for your vote.
>> >
>> > Please see this recommendation:
>> >
>> > As per our procedures:
>> > Each NCUC EC member will provide justification as to why one candidate
>> > is more qualified than other applicants - p. 9
>> >
>> > While we're at it, for the all EC - a note on evaluation criteria - p. 8
>> >
>> > NCSG Policy Committee:
>> >
>> > a. Has documented experience in ICANN policy-making processes, as well
>> > as a demonstrated understanding of ICANN’s structure and mission, and
>> > of the Policy Committee’s role and tasks.
>> >
>> > b. Has contributed previously to the formulation of comments or
>> > statements on behalf of the NCUC or the NCSG, and participated within
>> > the past 12 months on either the NCUC or NCSG mailing lists.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Renata
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Michael Karanicolas
>> > <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I vote for Kris Seeburn and Nick Shorey.
>> >>
>> >> Michael
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> >> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> Please find attached the candidates for NCUC representatives at Policy
>> >>> Committee NCSG
>> >>>
>> >>> We received these applications
>> >>>
>> >>> Kris Seeburn
>> >>> Farell Folly
>> >>> Dina Solveig
>> >>> Nick Shorey
>> >>>
>> >>> We need to appoint 2 representatives
>> >>>
>> >>> Candidates qualifications and review process can be found in item II
>> of our
>> >>> Operating Procedures
>> >>>
>> >>> https://www.ncuc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NCUC-Operati
>> ng-Procedures-Sept-2017.pdf
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>>
>> >>> Renata
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20171204/f1d4f58d/attachment.html>