[NCUC-EC] NCUC Procedures Rules EC Comment Period

Anna Loup loupac5556 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 13 17:55:34 CEST 2017


As a reminder:

Please find the dial-in details for the NCUC Exec call scheduled on
Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 16:00 UTC for 2 hours below.



*Please find the AC room and dial-in details here:*



*Adobe Connect room*: https://participate.icann.org/ncuc/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__participate.icann.org_ncuc_&d=DQMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=1zLKnja_XkZwjihxDWH1MSFL4lQBvJ5nUHcUxB9PgD4&s=yORDhzvmcNAxwxR1a6fXd_VU_6mcVUd-lO7X2-vARGs&e=>



*Passcodes/Pin codes:*

Participant passcode: NCUC EC

*For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the
conference.*

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Anna Loup <loupac5556 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Please find the dial in details for the NCUC Exec call scheduled on
> Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 16:00 UTC for 2 hours below.
>
>
>
> *Please find the AC room and dial in details here:*
>
>
>
> *Adobe Connect room*: https://participate.icann.org/ncuc/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__participate.icann.org_ncuc_&d=DQMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=1zLKnja_XkZwjihxDWH1MSFL4lQBvJ5nUHcUxB9PgD4&s=yORDhzvmcNAxwxR1a6fXd_VU_6mcVUd-lO7X2-vARGs&e=>
>
>
>
> *Passcodes/Pin codes:*
>
> Participant passcode: NCUC EC
>
> *For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the
> conference.*
>
>
>
> *Dial in numbers:*
>
> *Country*
>
>
>
> *Toll Numbers*
>
>
> *Freephone/Toll Free Number*
>
> ARGENTINA
>
>
>
>
>
> 0800-777-0519
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
> ADELAIDE:
>
> 61-8-8121-4842
>
> 1-800-657-260
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
> BRISBANE:
>
> 61-7-3102-0944
>
> 1-800-657-260
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
> CANBERRA:
>
> 61-2-6100-1944
>
> 1-800-657-260
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
> MELBOURNE:
>
> 61-3-9010-7713
>
> 1-800-657-260
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
> PERTH:
>
> 61-8-9467-5223
>
> 1-800-657-260
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
> SYDNEY:
>
> 61-2-8205-8129
>
> 1-800-657-260
>
> AUSTRIA
>
>
>
> 43-1-92-81-113
>
> 0800-005-259
>
> BELGIUM
>
>
>
> 32-2-400-9861
>
> 0800-3-8795
>
> BRAZIL
>
>
>
> 55-11-3958-0779
>
> 0800-7610651
>
> CHILE
>
>
>
>
>
> 1230-020-2863
>
> CHINA
>
> CHINA A:
>
> 86-400-810-4789
>
> 10800-712-1670
>
> CHINA
>
> CHINA B:
>
> 86-400-810-4789
>
> 10800-120-1670
>
> COLOMBIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 01800-9-156474
>
> CROATIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 080-08-06-309
>
> CZECH REPUBLIC
>
>
>
> 420-2-25-98-56-64
>
> 800-700-177
>
> DENMARK
>
>
>
> 45-7014-0284
>
> 8088-8324
>
> ESTONIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 800-011-1093
>
> FINLAND
>
>
>
> 358-9-5424-7162
>
> 0-800-9-14610
>
> FRANCE
>
> LYON:
>
> 33-4-26-69-12-85
>
> 080-511-1496
>
> FRANCE
>
> MARSEILLE:
>
> 33-4-86-06-00-85
>
> 080-511-1496
>
> FRANCE
>
> PARIS:
>
> 33-1-70-70-60-72
>
> 080-511-1496
>
> GERMANY
>
>
>
> 49-69-2222-20362
>
> 0800-664-4247
>
> GREECE
>
>
>
> 30-80-1-100-0687
>
> 00800-12-7312
>
> HONG KONG
>
>
>
> 852-3001-3863
>
> 800-962-856
>
> HUNGARY
>
>
>
> 36-1-700-8856
>
> 06-800-12755
>
> INDIA
>
> BANGALORE:
>
> 91-80-61275204
>
> INDIA
>
> MUMBAI:
>
> 91-22-61501629
>
> INDIA
>
> INDIA A:
>
>
>
> 000-800-852-1268
>
> INDIA
>
> INDIA B:
>
>
>
> 000-800-001-6305
>
> INDIA
>
> INDIA C:
>
>
>
> 1800-300-00491
>
> INDONESIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 001-803-011-3982
>
> IRELAND
>
>
>
> 353-1-246-7646
>
> 1800-992-368
>
> ISRAEL
>
>
>
>
>
> 1-80-9216162
>
> ITALY
>
> MILAN:
>
> 39-02-3600-6007
>
> 800-986-383
>
> ITALY
>
> ROME:
>
> 39-06-8751-6018
>
> 800-986-383
>
> ITALY
>
> TORINO:
>
> 39-011-510-0118
>
> 800-986-383
>
> JAPAN
>
> OSAKA:
>
> 81-6-7739-4799
>
> 0066-33-132439
>
> JAPAN
>
> TOKYO:
>
> 81-3-5539-5191
>
> 0066-33-132439
>
> LATVIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 8000-3185
>
> LUXEMBOURG
>
>
>
> 352-27-000-1364
>
> 8002-9246
>
> MALAYSIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 1-800-81-3065
>
> MEXICO
>
> GUADALAJARA (JAL):
>
> 52-33-3208-7310
>
> 001-866-376-9696
>
> MEXICO
>
> MEXICO CITY:
>
> 52-55-5062-9110
>
> 001-866-376-9696
>
> MEXICO
>
> MONTERREY:
>
> 52-81-2482-0610
>
> 001-866-376-9696
>
> NETHERLANDS
>
>
>
> 31-20-718-8588
>
> 0800-023-4378
>
> NEW ZEALAND
>
>
>
> 64-9-970-4771
>
> 0800-447-722
>
> NORWAY
>
>
>
> 47-21-590-062
>
> 800-15157
>
> PANAMA
>
>
>
>
>
> 011-001-800-5072065
>
> PERU
>
>
>
>
>
> 0800-53713
>
> PHILIPPINES
>
>
>
> 63-2-858-3716
>
> 1800-111-42453
>
> POLAND
>
>
>
>
>
> 00-800-1212572
>
> PORTUGAL
>
>
>
>
>
> 8008-14052
>
> ROMANIA
>
>
>
> 40-31-630-01-79
>
> RUSSIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 8-10-8002-0144011
>
> SAUDI ARABIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 800-8-110087
>
> SINGAPORE
>
>
>
> 65-6883-9230
>
> 800-120-4663
>
> SLOVAK REPUBLIC
>
>
>
> 421-2-322-422-25
>
> 0800-002066
>
> SLOVENIA
>
>
>
>
>
> 0-800-81310
>
> SOUTH AFRICA
>
>
>
>
>
> 080-09-80414
>
> SOUTH KOREA
>
>
>
> 82-2-6744-1083
>
> 00798-14800-7352
>
> SPAIN
>
>
>
> 34-91-414-25-33
>
> 800-300-053
>
> SWEDEN
>
>
>
> 46-8-566-19-348
>
> 0200-884-622
>
> SWITZERLAND
>
>
>
> 41-44-580-6398
>
> 0800-120-032
>
> TAIWAN
>
>
>
> 886-2-2795-7379
>
> 00801-137-797
>
> THAILAND
>
>
>
>
>
> 001-800-1206-66056
>
> TURKEY
>
>
>
>
>
> 00-800-151-0516
>
> UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
>
>
>
>
>
> 8000-35702370
>
> UNITED KINGDOM
>
> BIRMINGHAM:
>
> 44-121-210-9025
>
> 0808-238-6029
>
> UNITED KINGDOM
>
> GLASGOW:
>
> 44-141-202-3225
>
> 0808-238-6029
>
> UNITED KINGDOM
>
> LEEDS:
>
> 44-113-301-2125
>
> 0808-238-6029
>
> UNITED KINGDOM
>
> LONDON:
>
> 44-20-7108-6370
>
> 0808-238-6029
>
> UNITED KINGDOM
>
> MANCHESTER:
>
> 44-161-601-1425
>
> 0808-238-6029
>
> URUGUAY
>
>
>
>
>
> 000-413-598-3421
>
> USA
>
>
>
> 1-517-345-9004 <(517)%20345-9004>
>
> 866-692-5726 <(866)%20692-5726>
>
> VENEZUELA
>
>
>
>
>
> 0800-1-00-3702
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 😞
>> Won't make it to both, I think. Sorry
>> But will try
>>
>> Em 12/04/2017 16:16, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> ​Anna meant Thursday. It will be on Thursday ​at 16.00. Our bylaws
>>> meeting will be on Friday.
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
>>> raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Apologies, won't make it on Fri
>>>>
>>>> May have limited email access
>>>>
>>>> Em 12/04/2017 16:07, "hfaiedh ines" <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Friday should be fine for me. I have added my comments to the document
>>>>> too.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-04-11 21:25 GMT-04:00 Anna Loup <loupac5556 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The call is going to be at 16.00 this Friday. I will email Maryam to
>>>>>> schedule to call for the EC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anna Loup
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
>>>>>> raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Answers inline
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:58 PM, farzaneh badii
>>>>>>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Farzaneh
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
>>>>>>> raquino at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hi
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Thank you for this comprehensive document.
>>>>>>> >> I've answered the poll and commented on the doc.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I am confused about the outreach session.
>>>>>>> >> Procedures demand a list of things from the proposer but I haven't
>>>>>>> >> seen dedicated budget for outreach.
>>>>>>> >> How can we demand from the proposer a list of requirements if no
>>>>>>> >> budget or association with NCUC is present?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Since I completed the outreach part and specifically mentioned not
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> > allocate special budget to general outreach, I will explain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw says Farrell Folly all over the doc in huge letters
>>>>>>> Although I understand the contributors are to be acknowledged,
>>>>>>> perhaps
>>>>>>> this would be better as a last part of the document  (credits)
>>>>>>> As it is a collective work, though, of course the group knows best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > As I said
>>>>>>> > before, it is not a great idea to allocate a set budget to outreach
>>>>>>> > activities because sometimes we get many good requests that we
>>>>>>> might want to
>>>>>>> > fund and sometimes we don't get many. Having a set budget can
>>>>>>> prevent EC to
>>>>>>> > approve things for the best interest of the constituency. What is
>>>>>>> important
>>>>>>> > for EC to consider is regional diversity and the benefit of the
>>>>>>> outreach
>>>>>>> > event. It should be assessed whether the person has received
>>>>>>> funding before,
>>>>>>> > whether the event they are going to do outreach has the type of
>>>>>>> audience
>>>>>>> > that could be potentially NCUC members, if the outreach plan is
>>>>>>> detailed and
>>>>>>> > whether the outreach requester is an active member.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree w/ all this.
>>>>>>> this better detailment is what takes me to the next point - if
>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>> doesn't detail (previous or after outreach) what should EC do?
>>>>>>> will get back to this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > I dont understand your question on how can we demand a list of
>>>>>>> requirements
>>>>>>> > when there is no budget or association.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> some outreach are just about a member requesting a speaker or printed
>>>>>>> material - should they follow the same process?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > It is very clear that we consider
>>>>>>> > such requests and if EC decides, it can give the funding to the
>>>>>>> requestor.
>>>>>>> > But what we don't have is a budget allocated specifically to
>>>>>>> outreach for
>>>>>>> > each year. of course if all EC members want to have a specific
>>>>>>> budget and
>>>>>>> > have a detailed outreach policy like that of the travel support,
>>>>>>> then we can
>>>>>>> > do that. I just pointed out that by allocating a strict budget to
>>>>>>> outreach
>>>>>>> > you might limit effective outreach activities. For example, if  we
>>>>>>> need 4000
>>>>>>> > USD for the outreach Africa event this year and we decide to use
>>>>>>> NCUC
>>>>>>> > budget, and we have a budget cap of 4000 USD for outreach for the
>>>>>>> whole year
>>>>>>> > then our hands will be tight.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Moreover, while outreach is great, we also need to have events and
>>>>>>> > activities for in-reach and make our current members active.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> agree w/ all this too
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> also think inreach is priority and could be paired w/ events for
>>>>>>> training in internet policymaking w/ veterans
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >> Imagine if someone doesn't comply, also what could be the
>>>>>>> consequence?
>>>>>>> >> So I'd take maybe these would be good practices or
>>>>>>> recommendations but
>>>>>>> >> obligatory procedures seems a bit of a reach.
>>>>>>> >> However, as I followed the work of the group as EC only, I
>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>> >> this extended reach in scope could be something the members may
>>>>>>> wish
>>>>>>> >> to discuss.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > If someone does not comply with the requirements and arrange
>>>>>>> events with our
>>>>>>> > affiliation, we send a note to them and tell them to inform NCUC
>>>>>>> in future
>>>>>>> > events or we will contact the event organizers and tell them that
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> > affiliation they had was wrong.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > We need a process for those who want to do NCUC outreach or use
>>>>>>> NCUC as
>>>>>>> > their affiliation when organizing a session related to NCUC
>>>>>>> mission. These
>>>>>>> > procedures address them.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So getting back to this point
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK if members are going to in touch w/ EC for their planning then
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> have some support to properly picture any association they want to
>>>>>>> do.
>>>>>>> Members have varied knowledge of NCUC and experience in planning
>>>>>>> events.
>>>>>>> I just hope some leeway is given when they are, in good will,
>>>>>>> offering
>>>>>>> spaces to NCUC.
>>>>>>> Better to educate then police people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Renata
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Best,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Renata
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Anna Loup <loupac5556 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> > Hello All,
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > I am sending you the link for the Procedural Rules for
>>>>>>> commenting.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b-GyV4FQdIZ8MIWiKVznSsxl
>>>>>>> b-_z7GQCZotf1g_wosk/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > We will also be having a meeting to go over these rules. As a
>>>>>>> way to
>>>>>>> >> > ensure
>>>>>>> >> > the availability of as many people as possible, please fill out
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> >> > Doodle
>>>>>>> >> > poll by Tuesday at  11:59 UTC. Apologies for the short notice/
>>>>>>> short
>>>>>>> >> > timeframe.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > https://doodle.com/poll/ixeah9rcwtgs89tv
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Best,
>>>>>>> >> > Anna Loup
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >> > NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>>>>> >> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>> >> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>>>>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170413/c2664f59/attachment.html>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list