[NCUC-EC] Fwd: NCUC Outreach in Brazil - asking for support

Thu Apr 6 17:13:35 CEST 2017

Hi Farzaneh

Thanks, that's good to know. Keeping it simple then.

I'll plan the webinars then.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:41 AM, farzaneh badii
<farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
> Renata,
>
> We have to keep this simple:
>
> We have two sources of funding: 1. NCUC  2. ICANN
>
> What we do is when something is not possible to get funded by ICANN, then a
> request has to be sent to NCUC EC to decide whether it can be funded from
> NCUC.
>
> We have said many times that webinars for example are something that can be
> supported by ICANN. GSE can fund certain activities, we just need to ask
> them.
>
> I am going to schedule a call with GSE ( for Africa they were present in our
> CROPP call) and also a call with Milton our treasurer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Ines, Rafik and all
>>
>> I agree w/ Ines we need a more in-depth debate.
>>
>> Rafik, thanks for the info on CROPP
>>
>> What I guess me and Ines are referring to are local, regional, small
>> and maybe improvised categories of events.
>>
>> Sometimes, you don't even need budget but formal approval and/or
>> articulation with ICANN
>>
>> Sometimes we need material to be sent by mail. We also don't have
>> money or material in hands...
>>
>> I am also confused about our articulation w/ ICANN outreach itself.
>> Sometimes I think BC railroads us as priority in a few cases. I am not
>> complaining or asking for changes, I want to understand how to act
>> about this.
>>
>> Maybe it should be an NCUC EC meeting only, maybe a meeting w/ an
>> expert then where we ask for questions.
>>
>> I'm also personally also thinking we really need inreach. We have
>> great members already and need to train them urgently, they keep
>> asking repeatedly in the LAC case. Can I just go ahead and to webinars
>> myself w/ them?
>>
>> So thanks you for all your ideas, replies, suggestions
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > outreach budget from CROPP is 7500USD, information can be found here
>> >
>> > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=59647287#CROPPProcedures&Guidelines-EngagementEventAuthorizations(GNSOConstituenciesONLY)
>> >
>> > "Outreach events may include, and are not limited to: travel allocation
>> > for
>> > speakers/organizers (maximum of one out of region funded traveller per
>> > outreach event), booth, communications materials, catering/receptions,
>> > remote participation, etc. Details are to be submitted in the event
>> > proposal
>> > and outlined in the outreach event assessment. Proposals should include
>> > draft agendas and all elements requiring resources for. "
>> >
>> > it is up to EC to outline its needs and in which area the budget will be
>> > spent.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Rafik
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-04-06 23:03 GMT+09:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> I read all of Renata's emails but couldnt answer and was waiting for
>> >> someone more experienced to comment first. Besides, i did not receive
>> >> an
>> >> answer when i asked about outreach budget and how it should be used.
>> >> Could
>> >> we have some expert/ somebody from the icann financial team to have
>> >> more
>> >> details and know what we have and what we dont? What we can do and what
>> >> we
>> >> cant? We need guidelines.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 6, 2017 9:16 AM, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Farzi and all
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for your reply.
>> >>>
>> >>> There was a lot of improvisation in these informal talks so my fault
>> >>> on
>> >>> that.
>> >>>
>> >>> I will reach out to EC for guidance and support on other opportunities
>> >>> with better plans and hope to receive answers.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> Renata
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:05 AM, farzaneh badii
>> >>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Renata had to cancel her outreach events partly because we did not
>> >>> > respond
>> >>> > to this request. Remember that I am not a voting member of EC I only
>> >>> > come in
>> >>> > when there is a tie. But it was my fault not to follow up on her
>> >>> > request
>> >>> > with the EC. Please follow up on these requests on time in the
>> >>> > future.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Farzaneh
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> >>> > <raquino at gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Dear EC
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Math is not my strongest suit.
>> >>> >> But at least one part of the journeys needed I could secure
>> >>> >> funding,
>> >>> >> the rest, unfortunately not.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> To do all that it is necessary *400USD approximately
>> >>> >> Cost breakdown
>> >>> >> Rio - Curitiba - 100USD
>> >>> >> Curitiba - Sao Paulo - 100USD
>> >>> >> SP - Brasilia - 100 USD
>> >>> >> Brasilia - FOR - 100USD - changed from RIO - FOR - This one will
>> >>> >> continue SP-FOR and will be changed to an earlier date
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> So the talks in Curitiba and Brasilia are now only w/ newcomers
>> >>> >> Claudio Lucena and Bruna Santos
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Best,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Renata
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>> >> From: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> Date: Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:05 PM
>> >>> >> Subject: NCUC Outreach in Brazil - asking for support
>> >>> >> To: "Exec. Comm" <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Dear EC
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> As I have already mentioned on the list, there was a possibility
>> >>> >> for
>> >>> >> NCUC to do outreach in the South School of Internet Governance in
>> >>> >> Rio
>> >>> >> on this 1st week of April. GSE approved 2 plane tickets - FOR - RIO
>> >>> >> and RIO - FOR.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Knowing that there would be this event in Rio, several of the
>> >>> >> universities and other spaces which are interested in ICANN and
>> >>> >> NCUC
>> >>> >> work have reached out to book talks.
>> >>> >> In Rio, we have booked 2 talks.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I could raise funding for myself to SP for 2 talks in universities
>> >>> >> there.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> However, we received requests to Curitiba, Brasilia and Fortaleza
>> >>> >> (my
>> >>> >> hometown, needing a plane ticket to arrive earlier). In all these
>> >>> >> talks we would have as partner ICANNWiki for folks to do a hands-on
>> >>> >> on
>> >>> >> editing wiki entries about ICANN policy work.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> In total, Curitiba would be 1 talk - raised by our member/fellow
>> >>> >> Claudio Lucena -, Brasilia 1 talk - our member Bruna Santos
>> >>> >> arranged
>> >>> >> -, Fortaleza 5 talks - 4 universities I arranged and 1 talk in a
>> >>> >> Secretary of Science and Technology event.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> To do all that it is necessary 500USD approximately
>> >>> >> Cost breakdown
>> >>> >> Rio - Curitiba - 100USD
>> >>> >> Curitiba - Sao Paulo - 100USD
>> >>> >> SP - Brasilia - 100 USD
>> >>> >> Brasilia - FOR - 100USD - changed from RIO - FOR
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The programme of talks is at http://bit.ly/ssigside  (3
>> >>> >> universities
>> >>> >> in FOR I still have to add atm)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Ticket planes in Brazil are expensive if you buy them close to the
>> >>> >> date so I would kindly request EC to deliberate as soon as you can
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I am available for any other information or suggestion EC may have
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> If it's not possible to go these spaces, unfortunately we'll have
>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> cancel the talks because the universities don't really have a
>> >>> >> culture
>> >>> >> of remote participation so we can't start our relationship with
>> >>> >> them
>> >>> >> doing talks remotely. In the future, if we do this, it would be
>> >>> >> good
>> >>> >> if we could continue the relationship with the universities on
>> >>> >> occasional webinars or remote hubs to ICANN meetings (as you know
>> >>> >> there are no meetings in LAC until 2018).
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thank you
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Renata
>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>