[NCUC-EC] CROPP again and planning for FY17

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Farzaneh,

Thanks for this, seems good workaround. Maryam can double-check with
Benedetta about the feasibility for Kathy case.
I am also thinking if we can keep targeting the OECD ministerial and CSISAC
forum, many CSO are going to be there and it is a good opportunity. we have
to find a replacement to Renata.

Best,

Rafik

2016-04-19 17:33 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
>
>
> I looked at Kathy's INTA proposal, it will be held in a month, if she can
> be more convincing how she will do outreach for us then I think we can
> allocate it to her. ( and ofcourse if ICANN is too strict about 6 weeks
> notice we cant allocate it to her)
>
> I can also submit a proposal to go to RIPE. It's a technical meeting but
> with potentials for recruiting members that are interested in Civil Society
> work. I will send my proposal soon.
>
> And there is also Bill's proposal to go to EuroDIG.
>
> I have cc'd you so that this time you receive the email. Last time we did
> not act on this quickly. Please respond soon.
>
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On 18 April 2016 at 04:40, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> while I thought that we moved on with the CROPP for this year, we have to
>> deal with some issues raised after submitting the requests:
>>
>> - for Ayden because WSIS forum is quite close (the minimal period is 6
>> weeks),  ICANN staff is stating that impossible to move forward with the
>> request. I am seeing if we can get support here but we may have to
>> reallocate the slot.
>>
>> - For Renata, she sent me email saying that is because the political
>> situation in Brazil and her university she won't be able to go OECD meeting
>> this June.
>>
>> - for Aarti, since the meeting is in July we cannot use the slot from
>> FY16. while I asked ICANN staff previously about such case, there was some
>> misunderstanding here.
>>
>> so if we don't want to lose those slots, we have to reallocate them soon.
>> we don't have so much time or choice here. we can review previous proposals
>> (selecting from those relevant) and think about other possibilities to
>> assign CROPP slots in emergency.
>>
>> Aarti case sounds straightforward and we can use FY17 slots for it.
>>
>> those issues shows why CROPP planning should happen quite earlier. for
>> that purpose, we will have to work on NCUC outreach strategy soon to be
>> submitted for CROPP and initiate call for proposals early (even before July
>> 1st), also working closely with related ICANN staff on this.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20160420/db184f5d/attachment.html>