[NCUC-EC] EC Decision Making

[Edward Morris]

All of this works for me as well. "Decided" is a good idea. So...

If Bill wants to try it I'd ask him to come up with the exact headers and then get acknowledgement from all EC members that they recognize and understand the new procedure and their responsibilities under it. Don't forget... If you miss 4 consecutive EC votes you are deemed to have resigned from the EC.

On another matter...I've been in touch with Alain. For those religiously inclined, if you would include him in your prayers I'm sure he would appreciate it.

Ed 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 03:56:08PM +0100, Edward Morris (egmorris100 at gmail.com) wrote:
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> At the moment I'm hooked up to an IV in the hospital but you guys are providing me with some wonderful entertainment. Thank you.
>> 
>> Why don't we try this: When a formal decision needs to be made, the header should read "Reply Requested" or some such uniform term? That alerts the EC recipient they need to act.
>> 
>> Would this work for everyone?
> 
> It would work for me.
> 
> It would not guarantee responses, but such a message could be treated
> so that unless someone disagrees with the proposal or explicitly calls
> for a vote, the Chair can declare decision made by consensus.
> 
> But I would also want that the decision would then be posted with a
> similar agreed-upon tag in the subject line ("Decided:" or whatever).
> Indeed that would be more important.
> 
> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec