[NCUC-EC] EC Decision Making

[Edward Morris]

Hi guys,

At the moment I'm hooked up to an IV in the hospital but you guys are providing me with some wonderful entertainment. Thank you.

Why don't we try this: When a formal decision needs to be made, the header should read "Reply Requested" or some such uniform term? That alerts the EC recipient they need to act.

Would this work for everyone?

Ed 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:47:08AM -0300, Carlos A. Afonso (ca at cafonso.ca) wrote:
> 
>> I agree with Ed "Spock" Morris :) But I understand some people
>> (yours truly e.g) are having recurring difficulties timewise to
>> follow dialogues.
> 
> Yes. For that very reason I would like to see EC *decisions*
> clearly separated from the informal discussion on the list.
> 
>> Bill's suggestions makes sense.
> 
> Which of them?
> 
> My problem there is mainly the his suggestion is too fuzzy to accept
> or reject, and in particularly sidestep the crucial question of
> documentation.
> 
> Inasmuch as the idea is that not all issues require formal EC decision
> but can be decided by the Chair after giving the EC members a chance
> to voice their opinion (and possibly call for a vote), I'm fine with that.
> In fact I'd be perfectly happy with that, if only such decisions were then
> systematically documented.
> 
> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec