[NCUC-EC] Ballots

Tapani Tarvainen tapani.tarvainen at effi.org
Sat Nov 16 11:33:41 CET 2013


Just a quick report, I met Mary in the hotel lobby very briefly (she
was in a hurry), but she said she'd reply to me ASAP - I understood
she had someone in mind to replace her as the Franklin contact.
So it should be fine.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

On Nov 15 21:13, Edward Morris (egmorris100 at gmail.com) wrote:

> A number of reasonable solutions.
> 
> As they are a member I'd hate to take away their vote.  If we send the
> ballot I'm happy to write to her and inquire as to the Center's plans.
> Actually I probably should do that regardless. So...
> 
> As I'm  the EC member from North America I propose I'd write to her asking
> their intention. I'm ambivalent about whether we should send them the
> ballot while waiting for a response. What is the timetable?
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org
> > wrote:
> 
> > The response in the spring came from Mary, the address we had was her
> > personal address.
> > T.
> >
> > Edward Morris <edward.morris at alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not hearing objection and with 5 p.m. approaching in New Hampshire I
> >> called FPIPLC at UNH.
> >>
> >> The Executive Director of the Center is an Alexander J. Roberts. Her
> >> e-mail address is alexandra.roberts at law.unh.edu . Ms. Roberts was not in
> >> her office when I called.
> >>
> >> I'm amenable to any of the solutions previously proposed. If pushed my
> >> preference would be to send the ballot to the previously used e-mail
> >> address if institutional ( i.e. fpiplc at unh.edu) or to Ms. Roberts if it
> >> was personal. We shouldn't spend a lot of time on this but as they did
> >> respond 8 months ago...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <
> >> tapani.tarvainen at effi.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 15 17:05, William Drake (wjdrake at gmail.com) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Actually, while one doesn’t like to lose org members, I think
> >>> > realistically it might be advisable to drop them.
> >>>
> >>> Incidentally, our bylaws don't seem to provide for that...
> >>>
> >>> > See what she recommends, but she's way out of there, and it didn’t
> >>> > sound like there’s anyone left to support a continuing affiliation
> >>> > (not to mention that it’s sort of for profit…).
> >>>
> >>> OK. If she replies I'll report back here,
> >>> but for now I'll set their rep as "unknown" and mark
> >>> them as inactive (which will drop them from the ballot, too).
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Tapani Tarvainen
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> >>> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Lähetetty Android-puhelimesta K-9 Mail -ohjelmalla
> >



More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list