[NCUC-EC] Ballots

[William Drake]

Happy endings, good not to lose an org member, hope said person will vote, in the future if not this time.

BD

On Nov 16, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org> wrote:

> Just a quick report, I met Mary in the hotel lobby very briefly (she
> was in a hurry), but she said she'd reply to me ASAP - I understood
> she had someone in mind to replace her as the Franklin contact.
> So it should be fine.
> 
> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> 
> On Nov 15 21:13, Edward Morris (egmorris100 at gmail.com) wrote:
> 
>> A number of reasonable solutions.
>> 
>> As they are a member I'd hate to take away their vote.  If we send the
>> ballot I'm happy to write to her and inquire as to the Center's plans.
>> Actually I probably should do that regardless. So...
>> 
>> As I'm  the EC member from North America I propose I'd write to her asking
>> their intention. I'm ambivalent about whether we should send them the
>> ballot while waiting for a response. What is the timetable?
>> 
>> Ed
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The response in the spring came from Mary, the address we had was her
>>> personal address.
>>> T.
>>> 
>>> Edward Morris <edward.morris at alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Not hearing objection and with 5 p.m. approaching in New Hampshire I
>>>> called FPIPLC at UNH.
>>>> 
>>>> The Executive Director of the Center is an Alexander J. Roberts. Her
>>>> e-mail address is alexandra.roberts at law.unh.edu . Ms. Roberts was not in
>>>> her office when I called.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm amenable to any of the solutions previously proposed. If pushed my
>>>> preference would be to send the ballot to the previously used e-mail
>>>> address if institutional ( i.e. fpiplc at unh.edu) or to Ms. Roberts if it
>>>> was personal. We shouldn't spend a lot of time on this but as they did
>>>> respond 8 months ago...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <
>>>> tapani.tarvainen at effi.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 15 17:05, William Drake (wjdrake at gmail.com) wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually, while one doesn’t like to lose org members, I think
>>>>>> realistically it might be advisable to drop them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Incidentally, our bylaws don't seem to provide for that...
>>>>> 
>>>>>> See what she recommends, but she's way out of there, and it didn’t
>>>>>> sound like there’s anyone left to support a continuing affiliation
>>>>>> (not to mention that it’s sort of for profit…).
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK. If she replies I'll report back here,
>>>>> but for now I'll set their rep as "unknown" and mark
>>>>> them as inactive (which will drop them from the ballot, too).
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ncuc-ec mailing list
>>>>> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> --
>>> Lähetetty Android-puhelimesta K-9 Mail -ohjelmalla
>>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20131116/17685b79/attachment.html>