[Ec-ncuc] ncuc members list

[Edward Morris]

I strongly support our Chair and endorse "Discuss-NCUC" as a status quo
solution that continues our listserv historical legacy.

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

> I prefer Discuss and do not see a non-turf-strategem argument against it.
>  It was NCUC discuss before NPOC was added and consistency in the archive
> would have its virtue.  I am not interested in policing or (dis)couraging
> people from talking to each other on one list vs the other, do not believe
> we should preordain a hierarchy or division of labor, but also do not want
> to spend time fetishizing every small item into a matter of high principle
> that requires trench warfare.  So I will roll with whatever the consensus
> among elected EC members is.
>
> But it would be great to do soon!
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2013, at 10:10, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I believe we've already agreed to create a mailing list for ncuc
> > members. I would like to go ahead with it without further delay.
> >
> > There's been some debate about what the list should be called,
> > and as far as I can tell calling it simply "ncuc-members" would
> > be acceptable to everyone.
> >
> > Opinions, should I go ahead and create it?
> >
> > --
> > Tapani Tarvainen
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ec-ncuc mailing list
> > Ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ec-ncuc mailing list
> Ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ec-ncuc/attachments/20130210/bbe44d2a/attachment.html>